Literature DB >> 18811123

Comparative study of riboflavin-UVA cross-linking and "flash-linking" using surface wave elastometry.

Karolinne Maia Rocha1, Jerome C Ramos-Esteban, Ying Qian, Satish Herekar, Ronald R Krueger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate comparative stiffness values in porcine corneas after standard cross-linking and a new, rapid method of cross-linking (flash-linking) using surface wave elastometry.
METHODS: Ten porcine eyes were treated using an ultraviolet A (UVA) double diode light source with a wavelength of 370 nm and delivering an irradiance of 4.2 mW/cm2 at a distance of 1.2 cm while applying 0.1% riboflavin-5-phosphate drops to the central cornea every 5 minutes as a photosensitizer for 30 minutes (riboflavin-UVA group). The next 10 porcine corneas were treated with a single application of a customized photoactive crosslinking agent and 30 seconds of UVA light at the same power and wavelength (flash-linking group). Following treatment, the Sonic Eye system (PriaVision Inc) was used to measure ultrasound surface wave propagation time between two fixed-distance transducers applied to the cornea along central horizontal and vertical positions. Intraocular pressure was continuously monitored.
RESULTS: Mean surface wave velocity was determined from the last 5 of 10 sequential measurements for each eye, and was 90.87 +/- 15.26 m/s for all eyes with a mean standard deviation (SD) of 2.34 m/s among each eye in the riboflavin-UVA group versus 83.66 +/- 12.30 m/s with a mean SD of 2.69 m/s among each eye in the flash-linking group before treatment and 109.2 +/- 21.76 m/s with a mean SD of 2.15 m/s among each eye (riboflavin-UVA group) versus 109.2 +/- 18.42 m/s with a mean SD of 2.26 m/s among each eye (flash-linking group) after cross-linking. The mean surface wave velocity increased by 18.3 units from 90.87 to 109.2 m/s (P = .003) after cross-linking with riboflavin-UVA, and by 25.5 m/s from 83.66 to 109.2 m/s (P = .0001) after flash-linking. Surface wave velocity was noted to increase after both cross-linking techniques, but the differences observed did not reach statistical significance (P = .74).
CONCLUSIONS: A new, rapid method of cross-linking (flash-linking) is introduced by the use of a customized photoactive cross-linking agent. The method demonstrates similar efficacy in stiffening the cornea (when measured with surface wave elastometry) in comparison to standard cross-linking, but requires only 30 seconds of UVA exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18811123     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080901-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  11 in total

1.  Corneal collagen crosslinking for corneal ectasia of post-LASIK: one-year results.

Authors:  Gang Li; Zheng-Jun Fan; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Corneal collagen cross-linking: a review.

Authors:  David P S O'Brart
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis.

Authors:  Nacim Bouheraoua; Lea Jouve; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.

Authors:  Hany A Khairy; Moataz F Elsawy; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Marwa A Zaki; Sameh S Mandour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Long-term results of corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Maddalena De Bernardo; Luigi Capasso; Michele Lanza; Antonia Tortori; Stefania Iaccarino; Michela Cennamo; Maria Borrelli; Nicola Rosa
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-16

Review 7.  Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Z Shalchi; X Wang; M A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus in Iranian Patients: Outcomes at 1 year following treatment.

Authors:  Ladan Saffarian; Hamid Khakshoor; Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; Habibollah Esmaily
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10

Review 9.  Update on corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Messmer
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09

Review 10.  Keratoconus: current perspectives.

Authors:  Jayesh Vazirani; Sayan Basu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.