Thomas Riedel1, Manuela Kyburz, Philipp Latzin, Cindy Thamrin, Urs Frey. 1. Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Department of Paediatrics, Inselspital, University Children's Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. thomas.riedel@insel.ch
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We compared ventilation inhomogeneity assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and multiple breath washout (MBW) in preterm and term-born infants. We hypothesised that EIT measurements in spontaneously breathing infants are repeatable and that differences in regional ventilation distribution measured by EIT can distinguish between preterm and term-born infants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional group comparison study. SETTING: Lung function laboratory at a University Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen healthy term-born and 15 preterm infants at a matched postmenstrual age of 44 weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We concurrently measured ventilation inhomogeneity by EIT, ventilation inhomogeneity (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) by MBW and tidal breathing variables during unsedated quiet sleep. EIT measurements were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation 3.6%). Preterm infants showed significantly more ventilation of the independent parts of the lungs compared to healthy term-born infants assessed by EIT (mean difference 5.0, 95 CI 1.3-8%). Whereas the two groups showed no differences in lung volumes or ventilation inhomogeneities assessed by MBW, EIT discriminated better between term and preterm infants. (FRC/kg: mean difference 1.1 mL, 95% CI -1.4-3.8 mL; LCI: mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.32-0.25). CONCLUSIONS: EIT shows distinct differences in ventilation distribution between preterm and term-born infants, which cannot be detected by MBW. Although preterm infants are capable of dynamically maintaining overall functional residual volume and ventilation distribution, they show some spatial differences from fullterm infants.
OBJECTIVES: We compared ventilation inhomogeneity assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and multiple breath washout (MBW) in preterm and term-born infants. We hypothesised that EIT measurements in spontaneously breathing infants are repeatable and that differences in regional ventilation distribution measured by EIT can distinguish between preterm and term-born infants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional group comparison study. SETTING: Lung function laboratory at a University Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen healthy term-born and 15 preterm infants at a matched postmenstrual age of 44 weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We concurrently measured ventilation inhomogeneity by EIT, ventilation inhomogeneity (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) by MBW and tidal breathing variables during unsedated quiet sleep. EIT measurements were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation 3.6%). Preterm infants showed significantly more ventilation of the independent parts of the lungs compared to healthy term-born infants assessed by EIT (mean difference 5.0, 95 CI 1.3-8%). Whereas the two groups showed no differences in lung volumes or ventilation inhomogeneities assessed by MBW, EIT discriminated better between term and preterm infants. (FRC/kg: mean difference 1.1 mL, 95% CI -1.4-3.8 mL; LCI: mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.32-0.25). CONCLUSIONS: EIT shows distinct differences in ventilation distribution between preterm and term-born infants, which cannot be detected by MBW. Although preterm infants are capable of dynamically maintaining overall functional residual volume and ventilation distribution, they show some spatial differences from fullterm infants.
Authors: Inéz Frerichs; Holger Schiffmann; Robert Oehler; Taras Dudykevych; Günter Hahn; José Hinz; Gerhard Hellige Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-03-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Philipp Latzin; Claudia E Kuehni; David N Baldwin; Hanna L Roiha; Carmen Casaulta; Urs Frey Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Luciana Friedrich; Renato T Stein; Paulo M C Pitrez; Andrea L Corso; Marcus H Jones Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Luciana Friedrich; Paulo M C Pitrez; Renato T Stein; Marcelo Goldani; Robert Tepper; Marcus H Jones Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: P Latzin; L Sauteur; C Thamrin; A Schibler; D Baldwin; G J Hutten; M Kyburz; R Kraemer; T Riedel; U Frey Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2007-10
Authors: Ruth K Armstrong; Hazel R Carlisle; Peter G Davis; Andreas Schibler; David G Tingay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Hazel R Carlisle; Ruth K Armstrong; Peter G Davis; Andreas Schibler; Inéz Frerichs; David G Tingay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Angelo Polito; Simone Piga; Paola E Cogo; Carlo Corchia; Virgilio Carnielli; Monica Da Frè; Domenico Di Lallo; Isabella Favia; Luigi Gagliardi; Francesco Macagno; Silvana Miniaci; Marina Cuttini Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M Popková; E Kuriščák; P Hála; D Janák; L Tejkl; J Bělohlávek; P Ošťádal; P Neužil; O Kittnar; M Mlček Journal: Physiol Res Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 1.881
Authors: Florian Singer; Georgette Stern; Cindy Thamrin; Oliver Fuchs; Thomas Riedel; Per Gustafsson; Urs Frey; Philipp Latzin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240