G Zhai1, T Andrew, B S Kato, G M Blake, T D Spector. 1. Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK. guangju.zhai@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
SUMMARY: This longitudinal twin study documented that genetic factors explain 44-56% of the between-individual variance in bone loss at femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm in postmenopausal Caucasian women, providing a rationale for identifying the specific genes involved. INTRODUCTION: Although there is a significant genetic effect on peak BMD, until recently, no substantive studies on heritability of bone loss in human were available. The aim of the study was to estimate the heritability of the bone loss at multiple sites in postmenopausal Caucasian women. METHODS: Postmenopausal female monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins aged 40 or above at baseline were selected from the TwinsUK registry and followed up for an average of 8 years (range 5-14 years). All twins were noncurrent hormone replacement therapy users and not on any osteoporosis treatment. They had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of their hip, lumbar spine, and forearm several times (range 2-9) during the follow-up period. Individual bone losses at femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm were estimated by linear regression modeling. Structural equation modeling was utilized to estimate the heritability of the bone loss. RESULTS: A total of 712 postmenopausal Caucasian female twins (152 MZ and 204 DZ pairs) were included. MZ twins were older and had slightly lower BMD at all sites than DZ twins. DZ twins had slightly higher bone loss at lumbar spine, but similar at femoral neck and forearm compared to MZ twins. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the bone loss at all sites were significantly higher in MZ than DZ twin pairs (p = 0.0045, 0.0003, and 0.0007 for femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm, respectively), indicating a significant genetic influence on bone loss at these sites. After adjustment for age at baseline and weight change during the follow-up, the heritability estimate was 47% (95% CI 27-63%) for bone loss at femoral neck, 44% (95% CI 27-58%) for lumbar spine, and 56% (95% CI 44-65%) for forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that up to 56% of the between-individual variance in bone loss is due to genes, providing a rationale to identify specific genetic factors for bone loss.
SUMMARY: This longitudinal twin study documented that genetic factors explain 44-56% of the between-individual variance in bone loss at femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm in postmenopausal Caucasian women, providing a rationale for identifying the specific genes involved. INTRODUCTION: Although there is a significant genetic effect on peak BMD, until recently, no substantive studies on heritability of bone loss in human were available. The aim of the study was to estimate the heritability of the bone loss at multiple sites in postmenopausal Caucasian women. METHODS: Postmenopausal female monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins aged 40 or above at baseline were selected from the TwinsUK registry and followed up for an average of 8 years (range 5-14 years). All twins were noncurrent hormone replacement therapy users and not on any osteoporosis treatment. They had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of their hip, lumbar spine, and forearm several times (range 2-9) during the follow-up period. Individual bone losses at femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm were estimated by linear regression modeling. Structural equation modeling was utilized to estimate the heritability of the bone loss. RESULTS: A total of 712 postmenopausal Caucasian female twins (152 MZ and 204 DZ pairs) were included. MZ twins were older and had slightly lower BMD at all sites than DZ twins. DZ twins had slightly higher bone loss at lumbar spine, but similar at femoral neck and forearm compared to MZ twins. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the bone loss at all sites were significantly higher in MZ than DZ twin pairs (p = 0.0045, 0.0003, and 0.0007 for femoral neck, lumbar spine, and forearm, respectively), indicating a significant genetic influence on bone loss at these sites. After adjustment for age at baseline and weight change during the follow-up, the heritability estimate was 47% (95% CI 27-63%) for bone loss at femoral neck, 44% (95% CI 27-58%) for lumbar spine, and 56% (95% CI 44-65%) for forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that up to 56% of the between-individual variance in bone loss is due to genes, providing a rationale to identify specific genetic factors for bone loss.
Authors: J R Guthrie; P R Ebeling; J L Hopper; E Barrett-Connor; L Dennerstein; E C Dudley; H G Burger; J D Wark Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: A Tokita; P J Kelly; T V Nguyen; J C Qi; N A Morrison; L Risteli; J Risteli; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M T Hannan; D T Felson; B Dawson-Hughes; K L Tucker; L A Cupples; P W Wilson; D P Kiel Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Joel Eriksson; Daniel S Evans; Carrie M Nielson; Jian Shen; Priya Srikanth; Marc Hochberg; Shannon McWeeney; Peggy M Cawthon; Beth Wilmot; Joseph Zmuda; Greg Tranah; Daniel B Mirel; Sashi Challa; Michael Mooney; Andrew Crenshaw; Magnus Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Liesbeth Vandenput; Eric Orwoll; Claes Ohlsson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Alireza Moayyeri; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; David Karasik; Karol Estrada; Su-Mei Xiao; Carrie Nielson; Priya Srikanth; Sylvie Giroux; Scott G Wilson; Hou-Feng Zheng; Albert V Smith; Stephen R Pye; Paul J Leo; Alexander Teumer; Joo-Yeon Hwang; Claes Ohlsson; Fiona McGuigan; Ryan L Minster; Caroline Hayward; José M Olmos; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Joshua R Lewis; Karin M A Swart; Laura Masi; Chris Oldmeadow; Elizabeth G Holliday; Sulin Cheng; Natasja M van Schoor; Nicholas C Harvey; Marcin Kruk; Fabiola del Greco M; Wilmar Igl; Olivia Trummer; Efi Grigoriou; Robert Luben; Ching-Ti Liu; Yanhua Zhou; Ling Oei; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Joseph Zmuda; Greg Tranah; Suzanne J Brown; Frances M Williams; Nicole Soranzo; Johanna Jakobsdottir; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Kate L Holliday; Anke Hannemann; Min Jin Go; Melissa Garcia; Ozren Polasek; Marika Laaksonen; Kun Zhu; Anke W Enneman; Mark McEvoy; Roseanne Peel; Pak Chung Sham; Maciej Jaworski; Åsa Johansson; Andrew A Hicks; Pawel Pludowski; Rodney Scott; Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; Nathalie van der Velde; Mika Kähönen; Jorma S Viikari; Harri Sievänen; Olli T Raitakari; Jesús González-Macías; Jose L Hernández; Dan Mellström; Osten Ljunggren; Yoon Shin Cho; Uwe Völker; Matthias Nauck; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Robin Haring; Matthew A Brown; Eugene McCloskey; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Richard Eastell; John A Eisman; Graeme Jones; Ian R Reid; Elaine M Dennison; John Wark; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frederick C W Wu; Thor Aspelund; J Brent Richards; Doug Bauer; Albert Hofman; Kay-Tee Khaw; George Dedoussis; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Ulf Gyllensten; Peter P Pramstaller; Roman S Lorenc; Cyrus Cooper; Annie Wai Chee Kung; Paul Lips; Markku Alen; John Attia; Maria Luisa Brandi; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Terho Lehtimäki; José A Riancho; Harry Campbell; Yongmei Liu; Tamara B Harris; Kristina Akesson; Magnus Karlsson; Jong-Young Lee; Henri Wallaschofski; Emma L Duncan; Terence W O'Neill; Vilmundur Gudnason; Timothy D Spector; François Rousseau; Eric Orwoll; Steven R Cummings; Nick J Wareham; Fernando Rivadeneira; Andre G Uitterlinden; Richard L Prince; Douglas P Kiel; Jonathan Reeve; Stephen K Kaptoge Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: E Noon; S Singh; J Cuzick; T D Spector; F M K Williams; M L Frost; A Howell; M Harvie; R Eastell; R E Coleman; I Fogelman; G M Blake Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-01-09 Impact factor: 4.507