Literature DB >> 18809750

Effects of ultrasound modes on mandibular osteodistraction.

T H El-Bialy1, R F Elgazzar, E E Megahed, T J Royston.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that therapeutic pulsed ultrasound (pulsed) has superior stimulatory effect on bone fracture healing compared with continuous ultrasound (continuous). Our predictive hypothesis was that pulsed ultrasound can produce better bone formation during mandibular osteodistraction than continuous ultrasound. Thirty-six New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups of 12. Osteodistraction was performed at 3 mm/day for 5 days. Group 1 received pulsed, group 2 received continuous ultrasound, and group 3 was the control group (distraction only). Bone formation was assessed by quantitative bone density (QBD), mechanical testing, and histological examination. In the first 2 wks post-distraction, group 2 showed enhanced bone formation more than group 1 (p < 0.05); however, in the 3rd and 4th wks, group 1 showed more bone formation than group 2 (p < 0.05). Earlier stages of bone healing were enhanced more by continuous, whereas late stages were enhanced more by pulsed, ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809750     DOI: 10.1177/154405910808701018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  7 in total

1.  Pulsed and Continuous Ultrasound Increase Chondrogenesis through the Increase of Heat Shock Protein 70 Expression in Rat Articular Cartilage.

Authors:  Ki Won Nam; Dong Yel Seo; Min Hee Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-05-29

2.  Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 suspended in fibrin glue enhances bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.

Authors:  Yunfeng Li; Rui Li; Jing Hu; Donghui Song; Xiaowen Jiang; Songsong Zhu
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shenghan Lou; Houchen Lv; Zhirui Li; Peifu Tang; Yansong Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Comparison of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field treatments on OPG and RANKL expression in human osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Manon A Borsje; Yijin Ren; H Willy de Haan-Visser; Roel Kuijer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Prospective utility of therapeutic ultrasound in dentistry-Review with recent comprehensive update.

Authors:  Shalu Rai; Mandeep Kaur; Sumit Goel; Sapna Panjwani; Shailly Singh
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-08-28

6.  Effect of nonviral plasmid delivered basic fibroblast growth factor and low intensity pulsed ultrasound on mandibular condylar growth: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Harmanpreet Kaur; Hasan Uludağ; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation for Bone Fractures Healing: A Review.

Authors:  Poornima Palanisamy; Monzurul Alam; Shuai Li; Simon K H Chow; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.