Literature DB >> 18808264

Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians.

Krishna Savani1, Hazel Rose Markus, Alana L Conner.   

Abstract

Using experimental paradigms from economics and social psychology, the authors examined the cross-cultural applicability of 3 widely held assumptions about preference and choice: People (a) recruit or construct preferences to make choices; (b) choose according to their preferences; and (c) are motivated to express their preferences in their choices. In 6 studies, they compared how middle-class North American and Indian participants choose among consumer products. Participants in both contexts construct nonrandom preferences at similar speeds. Those in Indian contexts, however, are slower to make choices, less likely to choose according to their personal preferences, and less motivated to express their preferences in their choices. The authors infer that the strong link between preferences and choices observed among North Americans is not a universal feature of human nature. Instead, this link reflects the disjoint model of agency, which prescribes that people should choose freely on the basis of their preferences. In contrast, Indian contexts reflect and promote a conjoint model of agency, according to which agency is responsive to the desires and expectations of important others and may require restraining one's preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808264     DOI: 10.1037/a0011618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

Review 1.  Theory and methods in cultural neuroscience.

Authors:  Joan Y Chiao; Ahmad R Hariri; Tokiko Harada; Yoko Mano; Norihiro Sadato; Todd B Parrish; Tetsuya Iidaka
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Once a frog-lover, always a frog-lover?: Infants' goal generalization is influenced by the nature of accompanying speech.

Authors:  Alia Martin; Catharyn C Shelton; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Connectivity between mPFC and PCC predicts post-choice attitude change: The self-referential processing hypothesis of choice justification.

Authors:  Steven Tompson; Hannah Faye Chua; Shinobu Kitayama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The choice is yours: Infants' expectations about an agent's future behavior based on taking and receiving actions.

Authors:  Arianne E Eason; Daniel Doctor; Ellen Chang; Tamar Kushnir; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  Identifying when choice helps: clarifying the relationships between choice making, self-construal, and pain.

Authors:  Jacob Fox; Shane R Close; Jason P Rose; Andrew L Geers
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-01-07

6.  Cultural Neuroscience: Progress and Promise.

Authors:  Joan Y Chiao; Bobby K Cheon; Narun Pornpattanangkul; Alissa J Mrazek; Katherine D Blizinsky
Journal:  Psychol Inq       Date:  2013-01-01

7.  Impression Management in Survey Responding: Easier for Collectivists or Individualists?

Authors:  Hila Riemer; Sharon Shavitt
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2011-04

8.  The salience of choice fuels independence: Implications for self-perception, cognition, and behavior.

Authors:  Kevin Nanakdewa; Shilpa Madan; Krishna Savani; Hazel Rose Markus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Oscillatory alpha power at rest reveals an independent self: A cross-cultural investigation.

Authors:  Brian Kraus; Cristina E Salvador; Aya Kamikubo; Nai-Ching Hsiao; Jon-Fan Hu; Mayumi Karasawa; Shinobu Kitayama
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.111

10.  Unrealistic optimism: East and west?

Authors:  Mary Sissons Joshi; Wakefield Carter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.