Literature DB >> 26743202

Identifying when choice helps: clarifying the relationships between choice making, self-construal, and pain.

Jacob Fox1, Shane R Close1, Jason P Rose1, Andrew L Geers2.   

Abstract

Prior research indicates that making choices before a painful task can sometimes reduce pain. We examined the possibility that independent and interdependent self-construals moderate the effect of choice on pain. Further, we tested between two types of choice: instrumental and non-instrumental. Healthy normotensive undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of three conditions prior to the cold pressor task. Participants in an instrumental choice condition selected which hand to immerse in the water and were told this choice might help reduce their pain. Non-instrumental choice participants selected which hand to immerse but were given no information about potential pain reduction. Control participants were given no choice or additional instructions. Low interdependence individuals reported less pain than high interdependence individuals-but only when given an instrumental choice. These data indicate that not all forms of choice reduce pain and not all individuals benefit from choice. Instead, individuals low in interdependence exhibit pain relief from instrumental choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice; Cold pressor; Independence; Interdependence; Pain; Self-construal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26743202     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9708-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  30 in total

1.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  S S Iyengar; M R Lepper
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-03

2.  Taiwanese students' gender, age, interdependent and independent self-construal, and collective self-esteem as predictors of professional psychological help-seeking attitudes.

Authors:  Christine J Yeh
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2002-02

Review 3.  Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.

Authors:  Daphna Oyserman; Spike W S Lee
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua K Swift; Jennifer L Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Why does choice enhance treatment effectiveness? Using placebo treatments to demonstrate the role of personal control.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Jason P Rose; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Jill A Brown; Suzanne G Helfer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-08-05

6.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; G P Maguire; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

7.  Choice and placebo expectation effects in the context of pain analgesia.

Authors:  Jason P Rose; Andrew L Geers; Heather M Rasinski; Stephanie L Fowler
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-08-18

Review 8.  Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

Authors:  A Robinson; R Thomson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 9.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

10.  Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms.

Authors:  C Chilvers; M Dewey; K Fielding; V Gretton; P Miller; B Palmer; D Weller; R Churchill; I Williams; N Bedi; C Duggan; A Lee; G Harrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.