Literature DB >> 18807190

MUlti-Dimensional Spline-Based Estimator (MUSE) for motion estimation: algorithm development and initial results.

Francesco Viola1, Ryan L Coe, Kevin Owen, Drake A Guenther, William F Walker.   

Abstract

Image registration and motion estimation play central roles in many fields, including RADAR, SONAR, light microscopy, and medical imaging. Because of its central significance, estimator accuracy, precision, and computational cost are of critical importance. We have previously presented a highly accurate, spline-based time delay estimator that directly determines sub-sample time delay estimates from sampled data. The algorithm uses cubic splines to produce a continuous representation of a reference signal and then computes an analytical matching function between this reference and a delayed signal. The location of the minima of this function yields estimates of the time delay. In this paper we describe the MUlti-dimensional Spline-based Estimator (MUSE) that allows accurate and precise estimation of multi-dimensional displacements/strain components from multi-dimensional data sets. We describe the mathematical formulation for two- and three-dimensional motion/strain estimation and present simulation results to assess the intrinsic bias and standard deviation of this algorithm and compare it to currently available multi-dimensional estimators. In 1000 noise-free simulations of ultrasound data we found that 2D MUSE exhibits maximum bias of 2.6 x 10(-4) samples in range and 2.2 x 10(-3) samples in azimuth (corresponding to 4.8 and 297 nm, respectively). The maximum simulated standard deviation of estimates in both dimensions was comparable at roughly 2.8 x 10(-3) samples (corresponding to 54 nm axially and 378 nm laterally). These results are between two and three orders of magnitude better than currently used 2D tracking methods. Simulation of performance in 3D yielded similar results to those observed in 2D. We also present experimental results obtained using 2D MUSE on data acquired by an Ultrasonix Sonix RP imaging system with an L14-5/38 linear array transducer operating at 6.6 MHz. While our validation of the algorithm was performed using ultrasound data, MUSE is broadly applicable across imaging applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18807190      PMCID: PMC2584164          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9564-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  21 in total

1.  A method of imaging viscoelastic parameters with acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  W F Walker; F J Fernandez; L A Negron
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles.

Authors:  M K Cheezum; W F Walker; W H Guilford
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A comparison of the performance of time-delay estimators in medical ultrasound.

Authors:  Francesco Viola; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Ensemble tracking for 2D vector velocity measurement: Experimental and initial clinical results.

Authors:  L N Bohs; B J Geiman; M E Anderson; S M Breit; G E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  2-D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging.

Authors:  P Chaturvedi; M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity.

Authors:  P Thévenaz; U E Ruttimann; M Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Computationally efficient spline-based time delay estimation.

Authors:  Francesco Viola; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  A real time system for quantifying and displaying two-dimensional velocities using ultrasound.

Authors:  L N Bohs; B H Friemel; B A McDermott; G E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Automated detection and tracking of individual and clustered cell surface low density lipoprotein receptor molecules.

Authors:  R N Ghosh; W W Webb
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  5 in total

1.  Normal and shear strain imaging using 2D deformation tracking on beam steered linear array datasets.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A PDE-Based Regularization Algorithm Toward Reducing Speckle Tracking Noise: A Feasibility Study for Ultrasound Breast Elastography.

Authors:  Li Guo; Yan Xu; Zhengfu Xu; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Recent results in nonlinear strain and modulus imaging.

Authors:  Timothy J Hall; Paul Barbone; Assad A Oberai; Jingfeng Jiang; Jean Francois Dord; Sevan Goenezen; Ted G Fisher
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

4.  An approach to unbiased subsample interpolation for motion tracking.

Authors:  Matthew M McCormick; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  A coupled subsample displacement estimation method for ultrasound-based strain elastography.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.