Literature DB >> 18805817

Foraging bats avoid noise.

Andrea Schaub1, Joachim Ostwald, Björn M Siemers.   

Abstract

Ambient noise influences the availability and use of acoustic information in animals in many ways. While much research has focused on the effects of noise on acoustic communication, here, we present the first study concerned with anthropogenic noise and foraging behaviour. We chose the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) as a model species because it represents the especially vulnerable group of gleaning bats that rely on listening for prey rustling sounds to find food (i.e. 'passive listening'). In a choice experiment with two foraging compartments, we investigated the influence of background noise on foraging effort and foraging success. We tested the hypotheses that: (1) bats will avoid foraging areas with particularly loud background noise; and (2) the frequency-time structure of the noise will determine, in part, the degree to which it deters bats. We found a clear effect of the type of noise on the allocation of foraging effort to the compartments and on the distribution of prey capture events. When playing back silence, the bats made equal use of and were equally successful in both compartments. In the other three treatments (where a non-silent sound was played back), the bats avoided the playback compartment. The degree to which the background noise deterred bats from the compartment increased from traffic noise to vegetation movement noise to broadband computer-generated noise. Vegetation noise, set 12 dB below the traffic noise amplitude, had a larger repellent effect; presumably because of its acoustic similarity with prey sounds. Our experimental data suggest that foraging areas very close to highways and presumably also to other sources of intense, broadband noise are degraded in their suitability as foraging areas for such 'passive listening' bats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18805817     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.022863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  38 in total

1.  Thermocron iButton and iBBat temperature dataloggers emit ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K R Willis; Joel W Jameson; Paul A Faure; Justin G Boyles; Virgil Brack; Tom H Cervone
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Gareth Jones; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Tuned in: plant roots use sound to locate water.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Mavra Grimonprez; Martial Depczynski; Michael Renton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Ambient noise causes independent changes in distinct spectro-temporal features of echolocation calls in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Nathan J Kleist; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Your attention please: increasing ambient noise levels elicits a change in communication behaviour in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Authors:  Rebecca A Dunlop; Douglas H Cato; Michael J Noad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Noisy human neighbours affect where urban monkeys live.

Authors:  Marina H L Duarte; Marco A Vecci; André Hirsch; Robert J Young
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Variation in the resting frequency of Rhinolophus pusillus in Mainland China: effect of climate and implications for conservation.

Authors:  Tinglei Jiang; Walter Metzner; Yuyan You; Sen Liu; Guanjun Lu; Shi Li; Lei Wang; Jiang Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Mining noise affects loud call structures and emission patterns of wild black-fronted titi monkeys.

Authors:  M H L Duarte; M C Kaizer; R J Young; M Rodrigues; R S Sousa-Lima
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche.

Authors:  D G E Gomes; C A Toth; H J Cole; C D Francis; J R Barber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.