Literature DB >> 18804715

Visits coded as intimate partner violence in emergency departments: characteristics of the individuals and the system as reported in a national survey of emergency departments.

Rula Btoush1, Jacquelyn C Campbell, Kristine M Gebbie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to explore the characteristics of intimate partner violence (IPV) victims whose visit was coded as IPV and the health care delivery system in emergency departments (ED).
METHODS: This study utilized a secondary data analysis of a national probability sample that comprised the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1997 to 2001.
RESULTS: There were 111 coded ED visits of IPV victims 16 years or older (equivalent of 482,979 out of 4 million national visits for the 5-year study period). Women (94%), African Americans (35%), those 25 to 44 years of age (64%), and uninsured patients (38%) were significantly more likely to be categorized as an IPV visit (odds ratios 14, 1.9, 2.7, and 2.4, respectively) compared with non-IPV visits. Characteristics of the health care delivery system (region, metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan, type of hospital, and type of health care provider) were not associated with IPV. DISCUSSION: Caution should be implemented when interpreting the study results because they represent only coded IPV visits in the emergency department. The study findings suggest the critical need to improve identification, documentation, and coding of IPV visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804715     DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  8 in total

1.  Association between emergency department resources and diagnosis of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Esther K Choo; Christina Nicolaidis; Craig D Newgard; Michael K Hall; Robert A Lowe; Michael Kennedy McConnell; K John McConnell
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.799

Review 2.  CAEP Position Statement Executive Summary : Where is the love? Intimate partner violence (IPV) in the Emergency Department (ED).

Authors:  Nour Khatib; Kari Sampsel
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.929

3.  United States emergency department visits coded for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Danielle M Davidov; Hollynn Larrabee; Stephen M Davis
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics.

Authors:  Michelle Patch; Youssef M K Farag; Jocelyn C Anderson; Nancy Perrin; Gabor Kelen; Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  A Scoping Review of Current Social Emergency Medicine Research.

Authors:  Ruhee Shah; Alessandra Della Porta; Sherman Leung; Margaret Samuels-Kalow; Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Lynne D Richardson; Michelle P Lin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-27

6.  Access to domestic violence advocacy by race, ethnicity and gender: The impact of a digital warm handoff from the emergency department.

Authors:  Laura Brignone; Anu Manchikanti Gomez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Mapping and exploring health systems' response to intimate partner violence in Spain.

Authors:  Isabel Goicolea; Erica Briones-Vozmediano; Ann Ohman; Kerstin Edin; Fauhn Minvielle; Carmen Vives-Cases
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Intimate partner violence-related hospitalizations in Appalachia and the non-Appalachian United States.

Authors:  Danielle M Davidov; Stephen M Davis; Motao Zhu; Tracie O Afifi; Melissa Kimber; Abby L Goldstein; Nicole Pitre; Kelly K Gurka; Carol Stocks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.