Literature DB >> 18804490

The underestimated role of olfaction in avian reproduction?

Jacques Balthazart1, Mélanie Taziaux.   

Abstract

Until the second half of the 20th century, it was broadly accepted that most birds are microsmatic if not anosmic and unable to detect and use olfactory information. Exceptions were eventually conceded for species like procellariiforms, vultures or kiwis that detect their food at least in part based on olfactory signals. During the past 20-30 years, many publications have appeared indicating that this view is definitely erroneous. We briefly review here anatomical, electrophysiological and behavioral data demonstrating that birds in general possess a functional olfactory system and are able to use olfactory information in a variety of ethological contexts, including reproduction. Recent work also indicates that brain activation induced by sexual interactions with a female is significantly affected by olfactory deprivation in Japanese quail. Brain activation was measured via immunocytochemical detection of the protein product of the immediate early gene c-fos. Changes observed concerned two brain areas that play a key role in the control of male sexual behavior, the medial preoptic nucleus and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis therefore suggesting a potential role of olfaction in the control of reproduction. The widespread idea that birds are anosmic or microsmatic is thus not supported by the available experimental data and presumably originates in our anthropomorphic view that leads us to think that birds do not smell because they have a rigid beak and nostrils and do not obviously sniff. Experimental analysis of this phenomenon is thus warranted and should lead to a significant change in our understanding of avian biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804490      PMCID: PMC2692081          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  70 in total

1.  A tangerine-scented social odour in a monogamous seabird.

Authors:  Julie C Hagelin; Ian L Jones; L E L Rasmussen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Behavioural and neurochemical responses of male and female chicks to cat odour.

Authors:  E Fluck; S Hogg; P S Mabbutt; S E File
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  Olfaction in the domestic fowl: a critical review.

Authors:  R B Jones; T J Roper
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-11

Review 4.  Avian orientation and navigation.

Authors:  W T Keeton
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  Two-way avoidance learning in pigeons after olfactory nerve section.

Authors:  R S Hutton; B M Wenzel; T Baker; M Homuth
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1974-07

6.  Olfactory bulb ablation or nerve section and behavior of pigeons in nonolfactory learning.

Authors:  B M Wenzel; A Salzman
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Connections of the piriform cortex in homing pigeons (Columba livia) studied with fast blue and WGA-HRP.

Authors:  V P Bingman; G Casini; C Nocjar; T J Jones
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Interspecific differences in Aethia spp. auklet odorants and evidence for chemical defense against ectoparasites.

Authors:  Hector D Douglas; Jason E Co; Tappey H Jones; William E Conner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Odor discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  W W Henton; J C Smith; D Tucker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Olfactory cues perceived at the home loft are not essential for the formation of a navigational map in pigeons.

Authors:  J A Waldvogel; J B Phillips
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  28 in total

1.  Rollers smell the fear of nestlings.

Authors:  D Parejo; L Amo; J Rodríguez; J M Avilés
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Sexual arousal, is it for mammals only?

Authors:  Gregory F Ball; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  An individual and a sex odor signature in kittiwakes?: study of the semiochemical composition of preen secretion and preen down feathers.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Géraldine Giacinti; Jean-Marie Bessière; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-08

4.  Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion reflect genetic make-up in a seabird species.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Hervé Mulard; Jean-Marie Bessière; Emeline Lhuillier; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sequence-based evidence for major histocompatibility complex-disassortative mating in a colonial seabird.

Authors:  Frans A Juola; Donald C Dearborn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pigeon odor varies with experimental exposure to trace metal pollution.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Marion Chatelain; Anaïs Pessato; Bruno Buatois; Adrien Frantz; Julien Gasparini
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Songbird chemosignals: volatile compounds in preen gland secretions vary among individuals, sexes, and populations.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Helena A Soini; Jonathan W Atwell; Craig Hollars; Milos V Novotny; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 8.  Female-Based Patterns and Social Function in Avian Chemical Communication.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Julie C Hagelin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Wax Ester Composition of Songbird Preen Oil Varies Seasonally and Differs between Sexes, Ages, and Populations.

Authors:  Leanne A Grieves; Mark A Bernards; Elizabeth A MacDougall-Shackleton
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  C-fos down-regulation inhibits testosterone-dependent male sexual behavior and the associated learning.

Authors:  Neville-Andrew Niessen; Jacques Balthazart; Gregory F Ball; Thierry D Charlier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.