INTRODUCTION: Around 30% of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Nonischemic cardiomyopathy has been identified as an independent predictor of response to CRT, probably due to the absence of compact scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relationship between cardiac scar, ischemia, and hibernation (both at the left-ventricular pacing site and as a total burden) and response to CRT was studied in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy using the perfusion-viability positron emission tomography (PET) test. Sixty-six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and traditional criteria for CRT were included. All patients underwent PET scan prior to CRT. Using PET, the amount and location of scarred, ischemic, and hibernating myocardium were characterized. No revascularization was indicated. Responders were defined by an improvement of left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >or= 5% and/or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class >or= 1 degree. During a mean follow-up of 26.2 +/- 22.2 months, there was a significant improvement in NYHA class and reverse remodeling in patients with the LV lead inserted remotely from the scar. However, reverse remodeling of a similar degree was present also in patients with extensive scarring including the lateral wall. The presence of ischemia, hibernation, or nontransmural scar at the pacing-site did not significantly modify the outcome of CRT as compared with viable myocardium. There were only 38% of CRT-nonresponders. Neither the extent of scar, ischemia, hibernation, or viability predicted outcome or mortality. Twenty patients died during the follow-up, one patient underwent heart transplant. CONCLUSIONS: At follow-up, response to CRT is observed regardless of the presence of extensive scarring. Left ventricular (LV) pacing at sites with ischemia, hibernation, or nontransmural scar does not appear to modify the effect of CRT as compared to viable tissue.
INTRODUCTION: Around 30% of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Nonischemic cardiomyopathy has been identified as an independent predictor of response to CRT, probably due to the absence of compact scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relationship between cardiac scar, ischemia, and hibernation (both at the left-ventricular pacing site and as a total burden) and response to CRT was studied in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy using the perfusion-viability positron emission tomography (PET) test. Sixty-six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and traditional criteria for CRT were included. All patients underwent PET scan prior to CRT. Using PET, the amount and location of scarred, ischemic, and hibernating myocardium were characterized. No revascularization was indicated. Responders were defined by an improvement of left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >or= 5% and/or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class >or= 1 degree. During a mean follow-up of 26.2 +/- 22.2 months, there was a significant improvement in NYHA class and reverse remodeling in patients with the LV lead inserted remotely from the scar. However, reverse remodeling of a similar degree was present also in patients with extensive scarring including the lateral wall. The presence of ischemia, hibernation, or nontransmural scar at the pacing-site did not significantly modify the outcome of CRT as compared with viable myocardium. There were only 38% of CRT-nonresponders. Neither the extent of scar, ischemia, hibernation, or viability predicted outcome or mortality. Twenty patients died during the follow-up, one patient underwent heart transplant. CONCLUSIONS: At follow-up, response to CRT is observed regardless of the presence of extensive scarring. Left ventricular (LV) pacing at sites with ischemia, hibernation, or nontransmural scar does not appear to modify the effect of CRT as compared to viable tissue.
Authors: Sebastian Lehner; Christopher Uebleis; Franziska Schüßler; Alexander Haug; Stefan Kääb; Peter Bartenstein; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Guido Germano; Heidi Estner; Marcus Hacker Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Steven A Niederer; A K Shetty; G Plank; J Bostock; R Razavi; N P Smith; C A Rinaldi Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 1.976