Literature DB >> 18802225

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation and lsokinetic Exercise on Muscular Power of the Quadriceps Femoris.

L A Nobbs, E C Rhodes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the power and strength changes, of the quadriceps femoris muscle group, following 6 weeks of training. Twenty-seven moderately trained, female subjects were placed into three equated groups: electrical stimulation plus isokinetic exercise (ES + IE), isokinetic exercise (IE), and electrical stimulation (ES). A CybexQ I1 isokinetic dynamometer was used for testing the quadriceps ' power and strength output at the velocities of 0, 30, 100, and 180 O/ sec. The ES + IE and ES groups received faradic stimulation (progressive from 10- 20 mA) from a Multitone Multifaradic Unit (model F283, Multitone Electric Co., London, England). In addition, the ES + IE group performed isokinetic contractions concurrently with the faradic stimulation. Thigh circumference (TC) and time to peak tension (TPT) were also calculated during the pre-, mid-, and post-tests. Results indicated that a significant power increment was evident between the pre- and posttests and the pre- and mid-tests for the combined groups (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant power increases between the three separate groups at the four velocities. Significant power differences (P c 0.05) for the combined groups between the pre- and post-tests and the pre- and mid-tests at the isokinetic velocities of 30 and OO/sec were also identified. TPT and TC did not change significantly for any group over the 6-week training period. This study indicated that the combined effects of ES + IE, IE, and ES are potentially effective means of improving power and strength; however, data did not reveal one method of training as being significantly superior to another. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986;8(5):260-268.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 18802225     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1986.8.5.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Frédéric Noé; Philippe Passelergue; Philippe Dupui
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Physiological adaptations to velocity-controlled resistance training.

Authors:  G J Bell; H A Wenger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effect of training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion strength.

Authors:  William R Holcomb
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effectiveness of Accelerated Recovery Performance for Post-ACL Reconstruction Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Anne R Wright; Andrew B Richardson; Christian K Kikuchi; Daniel B Goldberg; Jay M Marumoto; Darryl M Kan
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-11

6.  Effect of electrical stimulation training on the contractile characteristics of the triceps surae muscle.

Authors:  L Martin; G Cometti; M Pousson; B Morlon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.