OBJECTIVE: To determine whether brief intervention and contact is effective in reducing subsequent suicide mortality among suicide attempters in low and middle-income countries. METHODS:Suicide attempters (n = 1867) identified by medical staff in the emergency units of eight collaborating hospitals in five culturally different sites (Campinas, Brazil; Chennai, India; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran; and Yuncheng, China) participated, from January 2002 to October 2005, in a randomized controlled trial to receive either treatment as usual, or treatment as usual plus brief intervention and contact (BIC), which included patient education and follow-up. Overall, 91% completed the study. The primary study outcome measurement was death from suicide at 18-month follow-up. FINDINGS: Significantly fewer deaths from suicide occurred in the BIC than in the treatment-as-usual group (0.2% versus 2.2%, respectively; chi2 = 13.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This low-cost brief intervention may be an important part of suicide prevention programmes for underresourced low- and middle-income countries.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether brief intervention and contact is effective in reducing subsequent suicide mortality among suicide attempters in low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Suicide attempters (n = 1867) identified by medical staff in the emergency units of eight collaborating hospitals in five culturally different sites (Campinas, Brazil; Chennai, India; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran; and Yuncheng, China) participated, from January 2002 to October 2005, in a randomized controlled trial to receive either treatment as usual, or treatment as usual plus brief intervention and contact (BIC), which included patient education and follow-up. Overall, 91% completed the study. The primary study outcome measurement was death from suicide at 18-month follow-up. FINDINGS: Significantly fewer deaths from suicide occurred in the BIC than in the treatment-as-usual group (0.2% versus 2.2%, respectively; chi2 = 13.83, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This low-cost brief intervention may be an important part of suicide prevention programmes for underresourced low- and middle-income countries.
Authors: Gregory K Brown; Thomas Ten Have; Gregg R Henriques; Sharon X Xie; Judd E Hollander; Aaron T Beck Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Schmidtke; U Bille-Brahe; D DeLeo; A Kerkhof; T Bjerke; P Crepet; C Haring; K Hawton; J Lönnqvist; K Michel; X Pommereau; I Querejeta; I Phillipe; E Salander-Renberg; B Temesváry; D Wasserman; S Fricke; B Weinacker; J G Sampaio-Faria Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Kimberly A Van Orden; Tracy K Witte; Kelly C Cukrowicz; Scott R Braithwaite; Edward A Selby; Thomas E Joiner Journal: Psychol Rev Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 8.934
Authors: Nancy DiazGranados; Lobna A Ibrahim; Nancy E Brutsche; Rezvan Ameli; Ioline D Henter; David A Luckenbaugh; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Carlos A Zarate Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Amanda S Newton; Michele P Hamm; Jennifer Bethell; Anne E Rhodes; Craig J Bryan; Lisa Tjosvold; Samina Ali; Erin Logue; Ian G Manion Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 5.721