Mark Sinyor1, Ayal Schaffer2, David L Streiner3. 1. Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 2. Head, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 3. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people who have died from suicide in a large epidemiologic sample form clusters based on demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. METHOD: We conducted a coroner's chart review for 2886 people who died in Toronto, Ontario, from 1998 to 2010, and whose death was ruled as suicide by the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario. A cluster analysis using known suicide risk factors was performed to determine whether suicide deaths separate into distinct groups. Clusters were compared according to person- and suicide-specific factors. RESULTS: Five clusters emerged. Cluster 1 had the highest proportion of females and nonviolent methods, and all had depression and a past suicide attempt. Cluster 2 had the highest proportion of people with a recent stressor and violent suicide methods, and all were married. Cluster 3 had mostly males between the ages of 20 and 64, and all had either experienced recent stressors, suffered from mental illness, or had a history of substance abuse. Cluster 4 had the youngest people and the highest proportion of deaths by jumping from height, few were married, and nearly one-half had bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Cluster 5 had all unmarried people with no prior suicide attempts, and were the least likely to have an identified mental illness and most likely to leave a suicide note. CONCLUSIONS: People who die from suicide assort into different patterns of demographic, clinical, and death-specific characteristics. Identifying and studying subgroups of suicides may advance our understanding of the heterogeneous nature of suicide and help to inform development of more targeted suicide prevention strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people who have died from suicide in a large epidemiologic sample form clusters based on demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. METHOD: We conducted a coroner's chart review for 2886 people who died in Toronto, Ontario, from 1998 to 2010, and whose death was ruled as suicide by the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario. A cluster analysis using known suicide risk factors was performed to determine whether suicide deaths separate into distinct groups. Clusters were compared according to person- and suicide-specific factors. RESULTS: Five clusters emerged. Cluster 1 had the highest proportion of females and nonviolent methods, and all had depression and a past suicide attempt. Cluster 2 had the highest proportion of people with a recent stressor and violent suicide methods, and all were married. Cluster 3 had mostly males between the ages of 20 and 64, and all had either experienced recent stressors, suffered from mental illness, or had a history of substance abuse. Cluster 4 had the youngest people and the highest proportion of deaths by jumping from height, few were married, and nearly one-half had bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Cluster 5 had all unmarried people with no prior suicide attempts, and were the least likely to have an identified mental illness and most likely to leave a suicide note. CONCLUSIONS:People who die from suicide assort into different patterns of demographic, clinical, and death-specific characteristics. Identifying and studying subgroups of suicides may advance our understanding of the heterogeneous nature of suicide and help to inform development of more targeted suicide prevention strategies.
Authors: J John Mann; Alan Apter; Jose Bertolote; Annette Beautrais; Dianne Currier; Ann Haas; Ulrich Hegerl; Jouko Lonnqvist; Kevin Malone; Andrej Marusic; Lars Mehlum; George Patton; Michael Phillips; Wolfgang Rutz; Zoltan Rihmer; Armin Schmidtke; David Shaffer; Morton Silverman; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Airi Varnik; Danuta Wasserman; Paul Yip; Herbert Hendin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Guillaume Vaiva; Guillaume Vaiva; François Ducrocq; Philippe Meyer; Daniel Mathieu; Alain Philippe; Christian Libersa; Michel Goudemand Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-05-27
Authors: Mark Sinyor; Ayal Schaffer; Yasunori Nishikawa; Donald A Redelmeier; Thomas Niederkrotenthaler; Jitender Sareen; Anthony J Levitt; Alex Kiss; Jane Pirkis Journal: CMAJ Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Mark Sinyor; Marissa Williams; Ulrich S Tran; Ayal Schaffer; Paul Kurdyak; Jane Pirkis; Thomas Niederkrotenthaler Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: John L Oliffe; Mary T Kelly; Gabriela Gonzalez Montaner; Paul S Links; David Kealy; John S Ogrodniczuk Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Mervyn Manuel Hernández-Alvarado; Thelma Beatriz González-Castro; Carlos Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate; Ana Fresán; Isela E Juárez-Rojop; María Lilia López-Narváez; Mario Villar-Soto; Alma Genis-Mendoza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.390