Literature DB >> 18797312

Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.

Maria-Jose Corral1, Carles Escera.   

Abstract

Novel sounds embedded in a repetitive stream of auditory stimuli impair performance of the visual task at hand. Parmentier et al. suggested that this distraction effect might be because of the shifting cost of moving attention from the task-irrelevant (auditory) to the task-relevant (visual) channel, or from their shifting of spatial locations. Here, the source location of the sounds in an audio-visual distraction paradigm was varied systematically (headphones and 0, -18, -72, 18, and 72 degrees), and the results revealed significant distracting effects of novel sounds occurring in the headphone and the right location conditions. This supports the assumption that in the behavioral cost observed in the audio-visual distraction paradigm a spatial shift of attention is involved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797312     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283110416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  6 in total

1.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events.

Authors:  Anatole Nöstl; John E Marsh; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  What we expect is not always what we get: evidence for both the direction-of-change and the specific-stimulus hypotheses of auditory attentional capture.

Authors:  Anatole Nöstl; John E Marsh; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Context Dependence Signature, Stimulus Properties and Stimulus Probability as Predictors of ERP Amplitude Variability.

Authors:  Carlos Mugruza-Vassallo; Douglas Potter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mathematical Modeling of Brain Activity under Specific Auditory Stimulation.

Authors:  Marius Georgescu; Laura Haidar; Alina-Florina Serb; Daniela Puscasiu; Daniel Georgescu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.