Literature DB >> 18796826

Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury.

L K Dahle, M J Mueller, A Delitto, J E Diamond.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was 1) to establish the interrater reliability of classifying foot type by visual appraisal and 2) to determine any relationship between foot type and subsequent knee pain or ankle sprains. Seventy-seven athletes were evaluated by three trained physical therapists to determine interrater reliability of a visual appraisal to identify foot type. Feet were classified according to operational definitions, and specific criteria had to be met for the foot to be classified as supinated, pronated, or neutral. Questionnaires concerning knee pain were completed at the beginning of the season, and incidence of ankle sprain was followed throughout the football and cross country seasons for 55 athletes. The Kappa value for interrater reliability for visually assessing foot type was .72. There was a significant relationship between foot type and knee pain (X2 = 4.45, N = 55, df = 2, p < .05). There was no relationship between foot type and incidence of ankle sprain. These results indicate that 1) physical therapists trained in the procedure can reliably use visual appraisal to classify foot type, and 2) athletes with excessively pronated or supinated foot types may be more susceptible to knee pain than athletes with neutral foot types. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;14(2):70-74.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 18796826     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.2.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries.

Authors:  F G Neely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Can Serious Injury in Professional Football be Predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen?

Authors:  Kyle Kiesel; Phillip J Plisky; Michael L Voight
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-08

3.  The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading.

Authors:  Søren Spörndly-Nees; Brian Dåsberg; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Morten Ilum Boesen; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

Review 4.  Ankle injury risk factors in sports.

Authors:  H B Barker; B D Beynnon; P A Renström
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  THE USE OF A STATIC MEASURE TO PREDICT FOOT POSTURE AT MIDSUPPORT DURING RUNNING.

Authors:  Michael B Bade; Timothy L Chi; Kelly C Farrell; Amanda J Gresl; Laura J Hammel; Bradley N Koster; Ashley B Leatzow; Emily C Thomas; Thomas G McPoil
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

6.  Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot.

Authors:  Mette Kjærgaard Nilsson; Rikke Friis; Maria Skjoldahl Michaelsen; Patrick Abildgaard Jakobsen; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Correlation between Foot Arch Index and the Intensity of Foot, Knee, and Lower Back Pain among Pregnant Women in a South-Eastern Nigerian Community.

Authors:  Chidiebele Petronilla Ojukwu; Emeka Godson Anyanwu; Ginika Gladys Nwafor
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Michael R Gay; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Predictive Factors for Lateral Ankle Sprains: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Darlene F Murphy; Denise M Alosa
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Foot characteristics in association with inversion ankle injury.

Authors:  Katherine E Morrison; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.