OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency and type of antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (NSA-ab) in limbic encephalitis (LE). METHODS: Analysis of clinical features, neuropathologic findings, and detection of NSA-ab using immunochemistry on rat tissue and neuronal cultures in a series of 45 patients with paraneoplastic (23) or idiopathic (22) LE. RESULTS: NSA-ab were identified in 29 patients (64%; 12 paraneoplastic, 17 idiopathic). Thirteen patients had voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKC)-ab, 11 novel NSA (nNSA)-ab, and 5 NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-ab. nNSA-ab did not identify a common antigen and were more frequent in paraneoplastic than idiopathic LE (39% vs 9%; p = 0.03). When compared with VGKC-ab or NMDAR-ab, the nNSA associated more frequently with intraneuronal antibodies (11% vs 73%; p = 0.001). Of 12 patients (9 nNSA-ab, 2 VGKC-ab, 1 NMDAR-ab) with paraneoplastic LE and NSA-ab, concomitant intraneuronal antibodies occurred in 9 (75%). None of these 12 patients improved with immunotherapy. The autopsy of three of them showed neuronal loss, microgliosis, and cytotoxic T cell infiltrates in the hippocampus and amygdala. These findings were compatible with a T-cell mediated neuronal damage. In contrast, 13 of 17 (76%) patients with idiopathic LE and NSA-ab (8 VGKC-ab, 4 NMDAR-ab, 1 nNSA-ab) and 1 of 5 (20%) without antibodies had clinical improvement (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (LE), novel antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (nNSA-ab) occur frequently, coexist with antibodies against intracellular antigens, and these cases are refractory to immunotherapy. In idiopathic LE, the likelihood of improvement is significantly higher in patients with NSA-ab than in those without antibodies.
OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency and type of antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (NSA-ab) in limbic encephalitis (LE). METHODS: Analysis of clinical features, neuropathologic findings, and detection of NSA-ab using immunochemistry on rat tissue and neuronal cultures in a series of 45 patients with paraneoplastic (23) or idiopathic (22) LE. RESULTS:NSA-ab were identified in 29 patients (64%; 12 paraneoplastic, 17 idiopathic). Thirteen patients had voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKC)-ab, 11 novel NSA (nNSA)-ab, and 5 NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-ab. nNSA-ab did not identify a common antigen and were more frequent in paraneoplastic than idiopathic LE (39% vs 9%; p = 0.03). When compared with VGKC-ab or NMDAR-ab, the nNSA associated more frequently with intraneuronal antibodies (11% vs 73%; p = 0.001). Of 12 patients (9 nNSA-ab, 2 VGKC-ab, 1 NMDAR-ab) with paraneoplastic LE and NSA-ab, concomitant intraneuronal antibodies occurred in 9 (75%). None of these 12 patients improved with immunotherapy. The autopsy of three of them showed neuronal loss, microgliosis, and cytotoxic T cell infiltrates in the hippocampus and amygdala. These findings were compatible with a T-cell mediated neuronal damage. In contrast, 13 of 17 (76%) patients with idiopathic LE and NSA-ab (8 VGKC-ab, 4 NMDAR-ab, 1 nNSA-ab) and 1 of 5 (20%) without antibodies had clinical improvement (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (LE), novel antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (nNSA-ab) occur frequently, coexist with antibodies against intracellular antigens, and these cases are refractory to immunotherapy. In idiopathic LE, the likelihood of improvement is significantly higher in patients with NSA-ab than in those without antibodies.
Authors: Alex Iranzo; Francesc Graus; Linda Clover; Jaume Morera; Jordi Bruna; Carlos Vilar; José Enrique Martínez-Rodriguez; Angela Vincent; Joan Santamaría Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M Godbout; M G Erlander; K W Hasel; P E Danielson; K K Wong; E L Battenberg; P E Foye; F E Bloom; J G Sutcliffe Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Beau M Ances; Roberta Vitaliani; Robert A Taylor; David S Liebeskind; Alfredo Voloschin; David J Houghton; Steven L Galetta; Marc Dichter; Abass Alavi; Myrna R Rosenfeld; Josep Dalmau Journal: Brain Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Josep Dalmau; Erdem Tüzün; Hai-yan Wu; Jaime Masjuan; Jeffrey E Rossi; Alfredo Voloschin; Joachim M Baehring; Haruo Shimazaki; Reiji Koide; Dale King; Warren Mason; Lauren H Sansing; Marc A Dichter; Myrna R Rosenfeld; David R Lynch Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Annamaria Vezzani; Robert S Fujinami; H Steve White; Pierre-Marie Preux; Ingmar Blümcke; Josemir W Sander; Wolfgang Löscher Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: L Bataller; R Galiano; M García-Escrig; B Martínez; T Sevilla; R Blasco; J J Vílchez; J Dalmau Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sarosh R Irani; Katarzyna Bera; Patrick Waters; Luigi Zuliani; Susan Maxwell; Michael S Zandi; Manuel A Friese; Ian Galea; Dimitri M Kullmann; David Beeson; Bethan Lang; Christian G Bien; Angela Vincent Journal: Brain Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 13.501