Literature DB >> 18793877

Overcoming pubic arch interference with free-hand needle placement in men undergoing prostate brachytherapy.

Erin P Gibbons1, Ryan P Smith, Sushil Beriwal, Komanduri Krishna, Ronald M Benoit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study evaluates the postimplant dosimetry when free-hand needles were placed to overcome interference from the pubic arch. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of all patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy at our institution from 2001 to 2006 was performed. Postimplant dosimetry in men requiring free-hand needle placement was compared with postimplant dosimetry in men not requiring free-hand needle placement.
RESULTS: Of the 145 patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy, 8 patients required free-hand needle placement. The mean prostate volume in the free-hand needle cohort was 46.0cc with a mean of 3.4 free-hand needles placed. In the 137 patients not requiring free-hand needle placement, the mean volume was 39.7cc. The mean D(90), V(100), V(150), and rectal V(100) for the free-hand cohort was 129.5%, 96.3%, 81.6%, and 1.45cc, respectively. The mean D(90), V(100), V(150), and rectal V(100) in men not requiring free-hand needle placement was 126.8%, 97.1%, 78.7%, and 1.03cc, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The present study finds that adequate postimplant dosimetry can be obtained if free-hand needles are required due to pubic arch interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18793877     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  1 in total

1.  Design of an Optically Controlled MR-Compatible Active Needle.

Authors:  Seok Chang Ryu; Zhan Fan Quek; Je-Sung Koh; Pierre Renaud; Richard J Black; Behzad Moslehi; Bruce L Daniel; Kyu-Jin Cho; Mark R Cutkosky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.567

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.