Literature DB >> 18792508

An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts.

Paul E Dux1, Christopher L Asplund, René Marois.   

Abstract

Several accounts of the attentional blink (AB) have postulated that this dual-target deficit occurs because of limited-capacity attentional resources being devoted to processing the first target at the expense of the second (resource depletion accounts; e.g., Chun & Potter, 1995). Recent accounts have challenged this model (e.g., Di Lollo, Kawahara, Ghorashi, & Enns, 2005; Olivers, van der Stigchel, & Hulleman, 2007), proposing instead that the AB occurs because of subjects' inability to maintain appropriate levels of attentional controlwhen targets are separated by distractors. Accordingly, the AB is eliminated when three targets from the same attentional set are presented sequentially in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream. However, under such conditions poorer identification of the first target is typically observed, hinting at a potential trade-off between the first and subsequent target performances. Consistent with this hypothesis, the present study shows that an AB is observed for successive targets from the same attentional set in an RSVP stream when the first target powerfully captures attention. These results suggest that resource depletion contributes significantly to the AB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18792508      PMCID: PMC3644218          DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

2.  The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon.

Authors:  Jun-ichiro Kawahara; James T Enns; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-13

3.  Attentional capture triggers an attentional blink.

Authors:  William S Maki; Michael W Mebane
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

4.  The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Takatsune Kumada; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  The attentional blink.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J E Raymond; K M Arnell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.

Authors:  E Weichselgartner; G Sperling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures.

Authors:  M C Potter; E I Levy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P E Dux; B Wyble; P Jolicœur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  The attentional blink: increasing target salience provides no evidence for resource depletion. A commentary on Dux, Asplund, and Marois (2008).

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Thomas M Spalek; Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

3.  Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

4.  Attentional episodes in visual perception.

Authors:  Brad Wyble; Mary C Potter; Howard Bowman; Mark Nieuwenstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08

Review 5.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Dissociation between process-based and data-based limitations for conscious perception in the human brain.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers et al.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009

8.  Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Hannah L Pincham; Dénes Szűcs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Attentional tuning resets after failures of perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Warrick Roseboom; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.