Literature DB >> 18791770

Functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy in pigs: comparing a novel transverse ileal pouch to the J-pouch and straight ileoanal anastomosis.

F H Schmitz-Winnenthal1, M Kadmon, E Schwab, L V Galindo, K Bläuer, A Niethammer, U Hinz, F Thomas, B M Schmied, R Nobiling, J Weitz, M W Büchler, K Z'graggen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy followed by an ileoanal J-pouch procedure is the therapy of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. After low anterior rectal resection, the authors have reported on a novel, less complex pouch configuration, a transverse coloplasty pouch. The aim of the present work was to apply this new design to the ileal pouch construction, to evaluate feasibility, and to measure functional results in comparison with the J-pouch and the straight ileoanal anastomosis using the pig as an animal model.
METHODS: Twenty-three pigs underwent restorative proctocolectomy followed by reconstruction with straight ileoanal anastomosis (IAA; n = 5), J-pouch (n = 7), and a transverse ileal pouch (TIP; n = 11). Pigs were followed for 6 days postoperatively. Peristaltic function was assessed by manometry proximal to the pouch, in the reservoir, and at the level of the ileoanal anastomosis. Functional outcome was monitored by semiquantitative assessment of the general condition of the animals, postoperative feeding habits, and stool frequency and consistency. A Fourier analysis was performed in order to compare peristalsis in the ileal reservoirs. The reservoir volume was measured in situ by triple contrast computed tomography scan with 3D reconstruction.
RESULTS: Seventeen animals survived for 1 week. There was no difference in the general condition or the feeding habits of the groups. A significant number of pigs with the TIP pouch (7/10) had semisolid or formed stools as opposed to liquid stools after J-pouch (6/6) and IAA (4/5; p = 0.01). TIP animals had a lower stool frequency (3.2 +/- 1.14 per day) on day 6 after the operation than pigs with J-pouch, 5.33 +/- 1,03, and IAA, 4.6 +/- 1.82 (p = 0.0036). The in situ volume of the pouches did not differ significantly. The Fourier analysis demonstrated a disruption of peristalsis by the J-pouch and the TIP reconstruction but not after IAA.
CONCLUSION: The function of ileoanal reservoirs after proctocolectomy may result from the disruption of properistaltic waves after pouch formation. The mechanism of peristalsis disruption is independent of the in situ volume of the pouch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791770     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0682-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  17 in total

1.  Mucosal morphology and faecal bacteriology after ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Santavirta; J Mattila; M Kokki; M Matikainen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prospective randomized study of sulindac versus calcium and calciferol for upper gastrointestinal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F Seow-Choen; V Vijayan; V Keng
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Utsunomiya; T Iwama; M Imajo; S Matsuo; S Sawai; K Yaegashi; R Hirayama
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Transverse coloplasty pouch. A novel neorectal reservoir.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; C A Maurer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Association of decreased perfusion of the ileoanal pouch mucosa with early postoperative pouchitis and local septic complications.

Authors:  P Kienle; J Weitz; S Reinshagen; A Magener; F Autschbach; A Benner; J Stern; C Herfarth
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-10

6.  Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure.

Authors:  P W Marcello; P L Roberts; D J Schoetz; J A Coller; J J Murray; M C Veidenheimer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

7.  A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch--anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; C A Maurer; D Mettler; C Stoupis; S Wildi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Michelassi; John Lee; Michele Rubin; Alessandro Fichera; Kristen Kasza; Theodore Karrison; Roger D Hurst
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio; Feza H Remzi; Jeff Hammel; James M Church; Tracy L Hull; Anthony J Senagore; Scott A Strong; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Pouchitis--a poorly understood entity.

Authors:  M Mignon; C Stettler; S F Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distal pouch reconstruction with transverse jejunoplasty after experimental gastrectomy.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Dmitriy I Dovzhanskiy; Stefan Tudor; Felix Heiser; Greta Bergmann; Hussein Soliman; Lutz Schneider; Jens Werner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Stricture of ileo-anal J pouch anastomosis increased the intensity of pouchitis in an experimental rat model.

Authors:  Tomasz Banasiewicz; Jarosław Walkowiak; Sławomira Drzymała-Czyż; Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki; Przemysław Majewski; Maciej Biczysko; Zoran Stojcev; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Michał Drews
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.