Literature DB >> 18791055

Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations.

D Aletaha1, R Landewe, T Karonitsch, J Bathon, M Boers, C Bombardier, S Bombardieri, H Choi, B Combe, M Dougados, P Emery, J Gomez-Reino, E Keystone, G Koch, T K Kvien, E Martin-Mola, M Matucci-Cerinic, K Michaud, J O'Dell, H Paulus, T Pincus, P Richards, L Simon, J Siegel, J S Smolen, T Sokka, V Strand, P Tugwell, D van der Heijde, P van Riel, S Vlad, R van Vollenhoven, M Ward, M Weinblatt, G Wells, B White, F Wolfe, B Zhang, A Zink, D Felson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations on how to report disease activity in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) endorsed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).
METHODS: The project followed the EULAR standardised operating procedures, which use a three-step approach: (1) expert-based definition of relevant research questions (November 2006); (2) systematic literature search (November 2006 to May 2007); and (3) expert consensus on recommendations based on the literature search results (May 2007). In addition, since this is the first joint EULAR/ACR publication on recommendations, an extra step included a meeting with an ACR panel to approve the recommendations elaborated by the expert group (August 2007).
RESULTS: Eleven relevant questions were identified for the literature search. Based on the evidence from the literature the expert panel recommended that each trial should report the following items: (1) disease activity response and disease activity states; (2) appropriate descriptive statistics of the baseline, the endpoints and change of the single variables included in the core set; (3) baseline disease activity levels (in general); (4) the percentage of patients achieving a low disease activity state and remission; (5) time to onset of the primary outcome; (6) sustainability of the primary outcome; (7) fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations endorsed by EULAR and ACR will help harmonise the presentations of results from clinical trials. Adherence to these recommendations will provide the readership of clinical trials with more details of important outcomes, while the higher level of homogeneity may facilitate the comparison of outcomes across different trials and pooling of trial results, such as in meta-analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791055     DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.091454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  56 in total

1.  Disease activity and fatigue in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Sarah Ringold; Teresa M Ward; Carol A Wallace
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  The relationship between bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue scales and disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Seda Colak; Sevinc Can Sandikci; Derya Gokmen; Ahmet Omma
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Application of the National Institutes of Health Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to mental health research.

Authors:  William T Riley; Paul Pilkonis; David Cella
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2011-12

4.  Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: are we there yet?

Authors:  Karen Salomon-Escoto
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Clinically important changes in individual and composite measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity: thresholds applicable in clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria I Alba
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Semi-Automated Quantification of Finger Joint Space Narrowing Using Tomosynthesis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Shota Ichikawa; Tamotsu Kamishima; Kenneth Sutherland; Hideki Kasahara; Yuka Shimizu; Motoshi Fujimori; Nobutoshi Yasojima; Yohei Ono; Takahiko Kaneda; Takao Koike
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Establishing a core domain set to measure rheumatoid arthritis flares: report of the OMERACT 11 RA flare Workshop.

Authors:  Vivian P Bykerk; Elisabeth Lie; Susan J Bartlett; Rieke Alten; Annelies Boonen; Robin Christensen; Daniel E Furst; Sarah Hewlett; Amye L Leong; Anne Lyddiatt; Lyn March; James E May; Pam Montie; Ana-Maria Orbai; Christoph Pohl; Marieke Scholte Voshaar; Thasia Woodworth; Clifton O Bingham; Ernest H Choy
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 8.  EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Robert Landewé; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Cecile Gaujoux-Viala; Simone Gorter; Rachel Knevel; Jackie Nam; Monika Schoels; Daniel Aletaha; Maya Buch; Laure Gossec; Tom Huizinga; Johannes W J W Bijlsma; Gerd Burmester; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Cem Gabay; Juan Gomez-Reino; Marios Kouloumas; Tore K Kvien; Emilio Martin-Mola; Iain McInnes; Karel Pavelka; Piet van Riel; Marieke Scholte; David L Scott; Tuulikki Sokka; Guido Valesini; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Kevin L Winthrop; John Wong; Angela Zink; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Lilian H D van Tuyl; Maarten Boers
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Measure of function in rheumatoid arthritis: individualised or classical scales?

Authors:  R Seror; F Tubach; G Baron; F Guillemin; P Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.