Literature DB >> 18790677

Patients at risk for long-term sick leave because of low back pain.

M Du Bois1, M Szpalski, P Donceel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Ten percent of patients with low back pain (LBP) are not able to resume work within 3 months of sick leave, accounting for 90% of all medical and indemnity costs.
PURPOSE: To quantify the relative contribution of sociodemographic, clinical, occupational, and psychological risk factors in determining the non-return to work after 3 months of compensated LBP and to develop a screening tool to identify patients who require further guidance and rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A 6-month prospective cohort study of disabled workers applying for compensation benefit because of LBP during a 6-month period in the Belgian compulsory health insurance system. PATIENT SAMPLE: Three hundred and forty-six patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients unable to resume work within 3 months of sick leave were classified as bad outcomes.
METHODS: Consecutively, injured workers applying for income replacement benefits between October 2003 and March 2004 because of LBP were followed 6 months after the start of the sick leave period. All subjects underwent a standardized physical examination and completed a battery of 12 self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of the population had not resumed work 3 months after the start of the sick leave period. The risk factors for sickness absence more than 3 months were Oswestry disability index (odds ratio for each point increase: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.06), fear of avoidance severity score (odds ratio for each point increase: 1.05; confidence interval: 1.02-1.09), blue collar worker (odds ratio: 2.18; confidence interval: 1.21-3.92), LBP for less than 12 weeks before sick leave (odds ratio: 0.32; confidence interval: 0.17-0.64), and pain behavior (odds ratio for each point increase: 1.72; confidence interval: 1.25-2.39). A multivariate screening test based on five questions identified 80% of the patients unable to resume work after 3 months of sick leave (specificity: 56.6; cut off: 0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: A questionnaire comprising a limited set of items allows a practical screening of LBP patients unlikely to resume work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18790677     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  28 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  The Added Value of Collecting Information on Pain Experience When Predicting Time on Benefits for Injured Workers with Back Pain.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Renée-Louise Franche; Andrea D Furlan; Ben Amick; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-06

3.  Dose response and structural injury in the disability of spinal injury.

Authors:  Mohammed Shakil Patel; Philip Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

5.  Chiropractic management of patients post-disc arthroplasty: eight case reports.

Authors:  Julie O'Shaughnessy; Marc Drolet; Jean-François Roy; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-04-21

6.  Living conditions, including life style, in primary-care patients with nonacute, nonspecific spinal pain compared with a population-based sample: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Odd Lindell; Sven-Erik Johansson; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 7.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

8.  Bio-psychosocial determinants of time lost from work following non life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Stuart V Newstead; Wendy L Watson; Joan Ozanne-Smith; Roderick J McClure
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A comparative study of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Majid Rezvani; Masih Sabouri; Mehdi Mahmoodkhani; Ali Mokhtari; Donya Sheibani Tehrani
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Biopsychosocial factors and perceived disability in saleswomen with concurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Praneet Pensri; Prawit Janwantanakul; Puangsoi Worakul; Thanes Sinsongsook
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2010-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.