Literature DB >> 18788985

Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter?

Sze Y Liu1, Melissa A Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with disabilities (WWD) face significant barriers accessing healthcare, which may affect rates of routine preventive services. We examined the relationship between disability status and routine breast and cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older unmarried women and the differences in reported quality of the screening experience.
METHODS: Data were from a 2003-2005 cross-sectional survey of 630 unmarried women in Rhode Island, 40-75 years of age, stratified by marital status (previously vs. never married) and partner gender (women who partner with men exclusively [WPM] vs. women who partner with women exclusively or with both women and men [WPW]).
RESULTS: WWD were more likely than those without a disability to be older, have a high school education or less, have household incomes <$30,000, be unemployed, and identify as nonwhite. In addition, WWD were less likely to report having the mammogram or Pap test procedure explained and more likely to report that the procedures were difficult to perform. After adjustment for important demographic characteristics, we found no differences in cancer screening behaviors by disability status. However, the quality of the cancer screening experience was consistently and significantly associated with likelihood of routine cancer screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher quality of cancer screening experience was significantly associated with likelihood of having routine breast and cervical cancer screening. Further studies should explore factors that affect quality of the screening experience, including facility characteristics and interactions with medical staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18788985      PMCID: PMC2944439          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  47 in total

1.  What makes it so hard? Barriers to health promotion experienced by people with multiple sclerosis and polio.

Authors:  Heather Becker; Alexa Stuifbergen
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar

2.  Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Maria Hewitt; Susan S Devesa; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas--United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002.

Authors:  Lina Balluz; Indu B Ahluwalia; Wilmon Murphy; Ali Mokdad; Wayne Giles; Virginia Bales Harris
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2004-07-23

4.  The cancer screening project for women: experiences of women who partner with women and women who partner with men.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Laura Bonacore; Shirley J Wright; Gene Armstrong; William Rakowski
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2003

5.  The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Gerben Dejong; Susan E Palsbo; Phillip W Beatty; Gwyn C Jones; Thilo Knoll; Melinda T Neri
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Mammography rescreening among women of diverse ethnicities: patient, provider, and health care system factors.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Jacqueline M Golding; Farzaneh Tabnak; Patrick Fox
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2004-08

7.  Breast cancer and the uptake of mammography screening services by women with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  S G Sullivan; E J Glasson; R Hussain; B A Petterson; L M Slack-Smith; P D Montgomery; A H Bittles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Satisfaction with health care and cancer screening practices among women in a largely rural region of West Texas.

Authors:  Tyrone F Borders; Ronald D Warner; Gary Sutkin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Aging with a disability.

Authors:  Heidi Klingbeil; Heather R Baer; Pamela E Wilson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Psychosocial variables, external barriers, and stage of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Diane Ruth Lauver; Jeffrey B Henriques; Lori Settersten; Mary Carson Bumann
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identifying barriers to Papanicolaou smear screening in Korean women: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005.

Authors:  Su Jeong Park; Woong-Sub Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Implications of mobility impairment on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Elyse R Park; Kerry L Kilbridge
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Physical access barriers to care for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer among women with mobility impairments.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Kerry Kilbridge; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Breast cancer screening barriers and disability.

Authors:  Ana Todd; Alexa Stuifbergen
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.625

5.  Trends in mammography over time for women with and without chronic disability.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Stephen G Kurtz; Sowmya R Rao
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Xiaozhong Wen; Victoria Wilcox; Kate McCarthy-Barnett; Jeanne Panarace; Carol Manning; Susan Allen; William Rakowski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-09-23

7.  Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Stephen G Kurtz; Sowmya R Rao
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.554

8.  A double whammy: health promotion among cancer survivors with preexisting functional limitations.

Authors:  Deborah L Volker; Heather Becker; Sook Jung Kang; Vicki Kullberg
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study of Women with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Ana Todd; Alexa Stuifbergen
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2011

10.  Adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for breast and cervical cancer screening for women who have a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xinling Xu; Joshua R Mann; James W Hardin; Erin Gustafson; Suzanne W McDermott; Chelsea B Deroche
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.