BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence and morbidity of minor and subsyndromal depression in primary care elderly people, there are few data to identify those at highest risk of poor outcomes. The goal of this observational cohort study was to characterize the one-year outcomes of minor and subsyndromal depression, examining the predictive strength of a range of putative risks including clinical, functional and psychosocial variables. METHODS: Patients aged > or = 65 years were recruited from primary care medicine and family medicine practices. Of 750 enrollees, 484 (64.5%) completed baseline and one-year follow-up assessments of depression diagnosis (major depression vs. minor and subsyndromal depression vs. non-depressed) by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, depressive symptom severity (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression), and validated measures of other predictors. RESULTS: Patients with baseline minor and subsyndromal depression were more depressed than the non-depressed group at follow-up: They had a 7.0-fold (95% CI 4.5-10.8) risk of developing major depression, and a one-year adjusted Hamilton Depression Score of 11.0 (95% CI 10.2-11.8) compared with 7.8 (95% CI 7.1-8.5) for the non-depressed group; these outcomes were less severe than those of the major depression group. Independent predictors of depression outcomes included race, psychiatric and physical functioning, and social support. CONCLUSIONS: Minor and subsyndromal depression are likely to persist, and pose an elevated risk of worsening over one year. Clinicians and preventive interventions researchers should focus on modifiable risks, such as psychiatric functioning or social support, in elders suffering clinically significant depressive symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence and morbidity of minor and subsyndromal depression in primary care elderly people, there are few data to identify those at highest risk of poor outcomes. The goal of this observational cohort study was to characterize the one-year outcomes of minor and subsyndromal depression, examining the predictive strength of a range of putative risks including clinical, functional and psychosocial variables. METHODS:Patients aged > or = 65 years were recruited from primary care medicine and family medicine practices. Of 750 enrollees, 484 (64.5%) completed baseline and one-year follow-up assessments of depression diagnosis (major depression vs. minor and subsyndromal depression vs. non-depressed) by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, depressive symptom severity (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression), and validated measures of other predictors. RESULTS:Patients with baseline minor and subsyndromal depression were more depressed than the non-depressed group at follow-up: They had a 7.0-fold (95% CI 4.5-10.8) risk of developing major depression, and a one-year adjusted Hamilton Depression Score of 11.0 (95% CI 10.2-11.8) compared with 7.8 (95% CI 7.1-8.5) for the non-depressed group; these outcomes were less severe than those of the major depression group. Independent predictors of depression outcomes included race, psychiatric and physical functioning, and social support. CONCLUSIONS: Minor and subsyndromal depression are likely to persist, and pose an elevated risk of worsening over one year. Clinicians and preventive interventions researchers should focus on modifiable risks, such as psychiatric functioning or social support, in elders suffering clinically significant depressive symptoms.
Authors: Robert A Schoevers; Filip Smit; Dorly J H Deeg; Pim Cuijpers; Jack Dekker; Willem van Tilburg; Aartjan T F Beekman Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jeffrey M Lyness; JaeHyun Kim; Wan Tang; Xin Tu; Yeates Conwell; Deborah A King; Eric D Caine Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Jeffrey M Lyness; Moonseong Heo; Catherine J Datto; Thomas R Ten Have; Ira R Katz; Rebecca Drayer; Charles F Reynolds; George S Alexopoulos; Martha L Bruce Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-04-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Michael Von Korff; Evette J Ludman; Wayne J Katon; Carolyn Rutter; Jürgen Unützer; Elizabeth H B Lin; Terry Bush; Edward Walker Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Zahinoor Ismail; Eric E Smith; Yonas Geda; David Sultzer; Henry Brodaty; Gwenn Smith; Luis Agüera-Ortiz; Rob Sweet; David Miller; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Grace Chang; Sara J Ratichek; Christopher Recklitis; Karen Syrjala; Sunita K Patel; Lynnette Harris; Angie Mae Rodday; Hocine Tighiouart; Susan K Parsons Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Joseph S Goveas; Mark A Espeland; Patricia E Hogan; Hilary A Tindle; Regina A Shih; Jane M Kotchen; Jennifer G Robinson; Deborah E Barnes; Susan M Resnick Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Elizabeth Phelan; Barbara Williams; Kathryn Meeker; Katie Bonn; John Frederick; James Logerfo; Mark Snowden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 2.497