Jeffrey M Lyness1, Qin Yu, Wan Tang, Xin Tu, Yeates Conwell. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Jeffrey_Lyness@urmc.rochester.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prevention of late-life depression, a common, disabling condition with often poor outcomes in primary care, requires identification of seniors at highest risk of incident episodes. The authors examined a broad range of clinical, functional, and psychosocial predictors of incident depressive episodes in a well-characterized cohort of older primary care patients. METHOD: In this observational cohort study, patients age >/=65 years without current major depression, recruited from practices in general internal medicine, geriatrics, and family medicine, received annual follow-up assessments over a period of 1 to 4 years. Of 617 enrolled subjects, 405 completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) determined incident major depressive episodes. Each risk indicator's predictive utility was examined by calculating the risk exposure rate, incident risk ratio, and population attributable fraction, leading to determination of the number needed to treat in order to prevent incident depression. RESULTS: A combination of risks, including minor or subsyndromal depression, impaired functional status, and history of major or minor depression, identified a group in which fully effective treatment of five individuals would prevent one new case of incident depression. CONCLUSIONS: Indicators routinely assessed in primary care identified a group at very high risk for onset of major depressive episodes. Such markers may inform current clinical care by fostering the early detection and intervention critical to improving patient outcomes and may serve as the basis for future studies refining the recommendations for screening and determining the effectiveness of preventive interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Prevention of late-life depression, a common, disabling condition with often poor outcomes in primary care, requires identification of seniors at highest risk of incident episodes. The authors examined a broad range of clinical, functional, and psychosocial predictors of incident depressive episodes in a well-characterized cohort of older primary care patients. METHOD: In this observational cohort study, patients age >/=65 years without current major depression, recruited from practices in general internal medicine, geriatrics, and family medicine, received annual follow-up assessments over a period of 1 to 4 years. Of 617 enrolled subjects, 405 completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) determined incident major depressive episodes. Each risk indicator's predictive utility was examined by calculating the risk exposure rate, incident risk ratio, and population attributable fraction, leading to determination of the number needed to treat in order to prevent incident depression. RESULTS: A combination of risks, including minor or subsyndromal depression, impaired functional status, and history of major or minor depression, identified a group in which fully effective treatment of five individuals would prevent one new case of incident depression. CONCLUSIONS: Indicators routinely assessed in primary care identified a group at very high risk for onset of major depressive episodes. Such markers may inform current clinical care by fostering the early detection and intervention critical to improving patient outcomes and may serve as the basis for future studies refining the recommendations for screening and determining the effectiveness of preventive interventions.
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dennis S Charney; Charles F Reynolds; Lydia Lewis; Barry D Lebowitz; Trey Sunderland; George S Alexopoulos; Dan G Blazer; Ira R Katz; Barnett S Meyers; Patricia A Arean; Soo Borson; Charlotte Brown; Martha L Bruce; Christopher M Callahan; Mary E Charlson; Yeates Conwell; Bruce N Cuthbert; D P Devanand; Mary Jo Gibson; Gary L Gottlieb; K Ranga Krishnan; Sally K Laden; Constantine G Lyketsos; Benoit H Mulsant; George Niederehe; Jason T Olin; David W Oslin; Jane Pearson; Trudy Persky; Bruce G Pollock; Susan Raetzman; Mildred Reynolds; Carl Salzman; Richard Schulz; Thomas L Schwenk; Edward Scolnick; Jurgen Unutzer; Myrna M Weissman; Robert C Young Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-07
Authors: Allen J Dietrich; Thomas E Oxman; John W Williams; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; Sheila Barry; Patrick J Raue; Jean J Lefever; Moonseong Heo; Kathryn Rost; Kurt Kroenke; Martha Gerrity; Paul A Nutting Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-09-02
Authors: Shun-Chiao Chang; Wei Wang; An Pan; Richard N Jones; Ichiro Kawachi; Olivia I Okereke Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Charles F Reynolds; Stephen B Thomas; Jennifer Q Morse; Stewart J Anderson; Steven Albert; Mary Amanda Dew; Amy Begley; Jordan F Karp; Ariel Gildengers; Meryl A Butters; Jacqueline A Stack; John Kasckow; Mark D Miller; Sandra C Quinn Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Herbert C Schulberg; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Patricia R Houck; Sati Mazumdar; Charles F Reynolds; Bruce L Rollman Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Olivia I Okereke; Charles F Reynolds; David Mischoulon; Grace Chang; Nancy R Cook; Trisha Copeland; Georgina Friedenberg; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sarah T Stahl; Steven M Albert; Mary Amanda Dew; Michael H Lockovich; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 18.112