Wolfgang Zink1, Bernhard M Graf. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine were developed after evidence of bupivacaine-related severe toxicity. Despite a comparable analgesic profile, quantitative differences become evident with regard to their specific rate of systemic toxicity. The present article provides a concise review of the toxic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. RECENT FINDINGS: As lipophilicity is known to be a major determinant in local anesthetic toxicity, the clinical safety profile of ropivacaine seems to be more favorable than that of levobupivacaine. Experimental studies and case reports confirm this hypothesis, showing that ropivacaine is characterized by fewer (cardio) toxic effects and, most probably, a greater margin of safety. Both agents also may dose dependently damage neurons and skeletal muscle tissue at the injection site. Although their specific rate of neurotoxicity appears to be rather low, levobupivacaine is characterized by an outstanding myotoxic potential. SUMMARY: Compared with bupivacaine, both agents may be considered as 'more well tolerated' but not as 'totally well tolerated', as they are still capable of inducing systemic and local toxicity. However, ropivacaine seems to have the greatest margin of safety of all long-acting local anesthetics at present.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine were developed after evidence of bupivacaine-related severe toxicity. Despite a comparable analgesic profile, quantitative differences become evident with regard to their specific rate of systemic toxicity. The present article provides a concise review of the toxic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. RECENT FINDINGS: As lipophilicity is known to be a major determinant in local anesthetic toxicity, the clinical safety profile of ropivacaine seems to be more favorable than that of levobupivacaine. Experimental studies and case reports confirm this hypothesis, showing that ropivacaine is characterized by fewer (cardio) toxic effects and, most probably, a greater margin of safety. Both agents also may dose dependently damage neurons and skeletal muscle tissue at the injection site. Although their specific rate of neurotoxicity appears to be rather low, levobupivacaine is characterized by an outstanding myotoxic potential. SUMMARY: Compared with bupivacaine, both agents may be considered as 'more well tolerated' but not as 'totally well tolerated', as they are still capable of inducing systemic and local toxicity. However, ropivacaine seems to have the greatest margin of safety of all long-acting local anesthetics at present.
Authors: João Abrão; Cleverson R Fernandes; Paul F White; Antonio C Shimano; Rodrigo Okubo; Giovanni Bp Lima; José A Bachur; Sérgio B Garcia Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Hye Won Shin; Jeong Seop Soh; Hee Zoo Kim; Jinpyo Hong; Dong Ho Woo; Jun Young Heo; Eun Mi Hwang; Jae-Yong Park; C Justin Lee Journal: J Anesth Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Joseph M Maurice; Yan Gan; Fan-xin Ma; Yong-chang Chang; Michael Hibner; Yao Huang Journal: Acta Pharmacol Sin Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 6.150