Literature DB >> 18783423

Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.

Joannis Katsoulis1, Pawel Pazera, Regina Mericske-Stern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze computer-assisted diagnostics and virtual implant planning and to evaluate the indication for template-guided flapless surgery and immediate loading in the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with an edentulous maxilla were selected for this study. The three-dimensional analysis and virtual implant planning was performed with the NobelGuide software program (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Prior to the computer tomography aesthetics and functional aspects were checked clinically. Either a well-fitting denture or an optimized prosthetic setup was used and then converted to a radiographic template. This allowed for a computer-guided analysis of the jaw together with the prosthesis. Accordingly, the best implant position was determined in relation to the bone structure and prospective tooth position. For all jaws, the hypothetical indication for (1) four implants with a bar overdenture and (2) six implants with a simple fixed prosthesis were planned. The planning of the optimized implant position was then analyzed as follows: the number of implants was calculated that could be placed in sufficient quantity of bone. Additional surgical procedures (guided bone regeneration, sinus floor elevation) that would be necessary due the reduced bone quality and quantity were identified. The indication of template-guided, flapless surgery or an immediate loaded protocol was evaluated.
RESULTS: Model (a) - bar overdentures: for 28 patients (70%), all four implants could be placed in sufficient bone (total 112 implants). Thus, a full, flapless procedure could be suggested. For six patients (15%), sufficient bone was not available for any of their planned implants. The remaining six patients had exhibited a combination of sufficient or insufficient bone. Model (b) - simple fixed prosthesis: for 12 patients (30%), all six implants could be placed in sufficient bone (total 72 implants). Thus, a full, flapless procedure could be suggested. For seven patients (17%), sufficient bone was not available for any of their planned implants. The remaining 21 patients had exhibited a combination of sufficient or insufficient bone. DISCUSSION: In the maxilla, advanced atrophy is often observed, and implant placement becomes difficult or impossible. Thus, flapless surgery or an immediate loading protocol can be performed just in a selected number of patients. Nevertheless, the use of a computer program for prosthetically driven implant planning is highly efficient and safe. The three-dimensional view of the maxilla allows the determination of the best implant position, the optimization of the implant axis, and the definition of the best surgical and prosthetic solution for the patient. Thus, a protocol that combines a computer-guided technique with conventional surgical procedures becomes a promising option, which needs to be further evaluated and improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783423     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  11 in total

1.  Computer-guided technique evaluation of the bony palate for planning individual implant placement.

Authors:  Pinar Cagimni; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asim Ozer; Zuhal Kazak
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review.

Authors:  Gokce-Soganci Unsal; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Samantha Lakhia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: a case report.

Authors:  Thomas Spielau; Uli Hauschild; Joannis Katsoulis
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Multivariate analysis of causal factors influencing accuracy of guided implant surgery for partial edentulism: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsumura; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Akihiro Kaminaka; Hirofumi Yatani; Daijiro Kabata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Computer guided implantology accuracy and complications.

Authors:  Vincenzo Bruno; Mauro Badino; Francesco Riccitiello; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Massimo Amato
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-09-03

6.  Relationship of central incisor implant placement to the ridge configuration anterior to the nasopalatine canal in dentate and partially edentulous individuals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Xueting Jia; Wenjie Hu; Huanxin Meng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.

Authors:  Tabea Flügge; Wiebe Derksen; Jobine Te Poel; Bassam Hassan; Katja Nelson; Daniel Wismeijer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Florian Kernen; Jaap Kramer; Laura Wanner; Daniel Wismeijer; Katja Nelson; Tabea Flügge
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Modified Technique for CAD/CAM Guided Implant Planning in the Presence of Existing Hopeless Teeth.

Authors:  Andrew C Johnson; Vinay Jain; Swati Ahuja
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2020-03

10.  Use of dental MRI for radiation-free guided dental implant planning: a prospective, in vivo study of accuracy and reliability.

Authors:  Tim Hilgenfeld; Alexander Juerchott; Johann M E Jende; Peter Rammelsberg; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Franz S Schwindling
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.