OBJECTIVE: Public health surveillance of physical activity in children in the UK depends on a parent-reported physical activity questionnaire which has not been validated. We aimed to validate this questionnaire against measurement of physical activity using accelerometry in 6-7-year-old children. METHODS: In 130 children aged 6-7 years (64 boys, 66 girls) we estimated habitual moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) using the Health Survey for England parent-report questionnaire for physical activity. For the same time period and the same children, we measured MVPA objectively using 7-day accelerometry with the Actigraph accelerometer. RESULTS: The questionnaire over-estimated MVPA significantly (paired t test, p<0.01). Mean error (bias) when using the questionnaire was 122 min/day (95% CI 124 to 169). Mean time spent in MVPA was 146 min/day (95% CI 124 to 169) using the questionnaire and 24 min/day (95% CI 22 to 26) using the accelerometer. Rank order correlations between MVPA measured by accelerometer and estimated by the questionnaire were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Public health surveillance of physical activity should not rely on this questionnaire. Levels of habitual physical activity in children are likely to be substantially lower than those reported in UK health surveys.
OBJECTIVE: Public health surveillance of physical activity in children in the UK depends on a parent-reported physical activity questionnaire which has not been validated. We aimed to validate this questionnaire against measurement of physical activity using accelerometry in 6-7-year-old children. METHODS: In 130 children aged 6-7 years (64 boys, 66 girls) we estimated habitual moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) using the Health Survey for England parent-report questionnaire for physical activity. For the same time period and the same children, we measured MVPA objectively using 7-day accelerometry with the Actigraph accelerometer. RESULTS: The questionnaire over-estimated MVPA significantly (paired t test, p<0.01). Mean error (bias) when using the questionnaire was 122 min/day (95% CI 124 to 169). Mean time spent in MVPA was 146 min/day (95% CI 124 to 169) using the questionnaire and 24 min/day (95% CI 22 to 26) using the accelerometer. Rank order correlations between MVPA measured by accelerometer and estimated by the questionnaire were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Public health surveillance of physical activity should not rely on this questionnaire. Levels of habitual physical activity in children are likely to be substantially lower than those reported in UK health surveys.
Authors: Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Mireille N M van Poppel; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee Journal: Sports Med Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Corinna C Winter; Carsten Müller; Jendrik Hardes; Georg Gosheger; Joachim Boos; Dieter Rosenbaum Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: K Konstabel; T Veidebaum; V Verbestel; L A Moreno; K Bammann; M Tornaritis; G Eiben; D Molnár; A Siani; O Sprengeler; N Wirsik; W Ahrens; Y Pitsiladis Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Sinead Brophy; Roxanne Cooksey; Michael B Gravenor; Rupal Mistry; Non Thomas; Ronan A Lyons; Rhys Williams Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Philippa S Yam; Ryan Morrison; Viki Penpraze; Carri Westgarth; Dianne S Ward; Nanette Mutrie; Pippa Hutchison; David Young; John J Reilly Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Russell Jago; Simon J Sebire; Katrina M Turner; Georgina F Bentley; Joanna K Goodred; Kenneth R Fox; Sarah Stewart-Brown; Patricia J Lucas Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 6.457