Literature DB >> 18781561

The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis.

Brad J Biggerstaff1, Dan Jackson.   

Abstract

The presence and impact of heterogeneity in the standard one-way random effects model in meta-analysis are often assessed using the Q statistic due to Cochran. We derive the exact distribution of this statistic under the assumptions of the random effects model, and also suggest two moment-based approximations and a saddlepoint approximation for Q. The exact and approximate distributions are then applied to obtain the corresponding distributions of the recently proposed heterogeneity measures I(2) and H(M)(2), the power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity and confidence intervals for the between-study variance parameter when the DerSimonian-Laird or the Hartung-Makambi estimator is used. The methodology is illustrated by revisiting a recent simulation study concerning the heterogeneity measures and applying all the proposed methods to four published meta-analyses.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18781561     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  34 in total

1.  Replication in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Eleftheria Zeggini; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Han; Wei Chen; Qicheng Zhao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-12

3.  XRCC1 and XPD genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Li-Peng Jiang; Yu Yin; Ya-Di Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-04

4.  Meta-Analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Guangyu Tong; Guang Guo
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2019-11-20

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited.

Authors:  Rebecca DerSimonian; Nan Laird
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuting Li; Jianxing Guo; Hongmei Yang; Hongxiang Li; Yangyang Shen; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Comparison of three tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in multicenter trials with unequal sample sizes within and among centers.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Peyman Jafari
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A sensitivity analysis framework for the treatment effect measure used in the meta-analysis of comparative binary data from randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Rose Baker; Jack Bowden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses.

Authors:  Charlotte Guddat; Ulrich Grouven; Ralf Bender; Guido Skipka
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-28

10.  Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.