BACKGROUND: Motor imagery may enhance motor recovery after stroke. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of patients able to perform motor imagery, the feasibility of delivery of motor imagery training (MIT), and the effects of MIT on motor recovery in an exploratory study. METHODS: An immediate pretreatment and posttreatment single-group design was used to study 10 patients after subcortical stroke with neuromuscular weakness in the upper limb. MIT that included upper limb activities reflecting everyday tasks was provided for 10 consecutive working days. Measures included assessment of chaotic motor imagery, patient report of tolerability of MIT, Motricity Index (MI), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and quality of movement (MAL-QOM). MIT dose was changed in response to patient feedback. Graphed motor function scores were inspected visually for clinically important changes. RESULTS: Four of the 10 patients were unable to perform motor imagery. Patient opinion was positive about the content and shaped daily dose of MIT given in two 20-minute periods separated by a 10-minute rest. Clinically important changes in motor scores were found. Four patients increased MI score (range 8-16), 3 patients increased 9HPT score (range 0.02-0.04 pegs/second), and 4 patients increased MAL-QOM score (range 0.63-1.29). CONCLUSIONS: MIT was received positively by patients, but 40% were unable to perform imagery and interindividual variations were found on motor function.
BACKGROUND: Motor imagery may enhance motor recovery after stroke. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of patients able to perform motor imagery, the feasibility of delivery of motor imagery training (MIT), and the effects of MIT on motor recovery in an exploratory study. METHODS: An immediate pretreatment and posttreatment single-group design was used to study 10 patients after subcortical stroke with neuromuscular weakness in the upper limb. MIT that included upper limb activities reflecting everyday tasks was provided for 10 consecutive working days. Measures included assessment of chaotic motor imagery, patient report of tolerability of MIT, Motricity Index (MI), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and quality of movement (MAL-QOM). MIT dose was changed in response to patient feedback. Graphed motor function scores were inspected visually for clinically important changes. RESULTS: Four of the 10 patients were unable to perform motor imagery. Patient opinion was positive about the content and shaped daily dose of MIT given in two 20-minute periods separated by a 10-minute rest. Clinically important changes in motor scores were found. Four patients increased MI score (range 8-16), 3 patients increased 9HPT score (range 0.02-0.04 pegs/second), and 4 patients increased MAL-QOM score (range 0.63-1.29). CONCLUSIONS: MIT was received positively by patients, but 40% were unable to perform imagery and interindividual variations were found on motor function.
Authors: Andrea Tacchino; Marco Bove; Ludovico Pedullà; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giampaolo Brichetto Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Catarina Saiote; Andrea Tacchino; Giampaolo Brichetto; Luca Roccatagliata; Giulia Bommarito; Christian Cordano; Mario Battaglia; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Matilde Inglese Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Mary Ellen Stoykov; Erin King; Fabian J David; Amanda Vatinno; Louis Fogg; Daniel M Corcos Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2020 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Susy M Braun; Jolanda C van Haastregt; Anna J Beurskens; Alexandra I Gielen; Derick T Wade; Jos M Schols Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 2.474