Literature DB >> 18780864

Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.

Quirine Lamberts Okonkwo1, Gerrit Draisma, Arno der Kinderen, Martin L Brown, Harry J de Koning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: India, the largest developing country, has a steadily rising incidence of breast cancer. Estimates and comparisons of the cost-effectiveness of feasible breast cancer screening policies in developing countries and identification of the determinants of cost and efficacy are needed.
METHODS: A Microsimulation Screening Analysis model of breast cancer was calibrated to available data on breast cancer incidence, stage distribution, and mortality in India. The model was used to estimate the costs of screening for breast cancer in India, its effects on mortality, and its cost-effectiveness (ie, costs of screening per life-year gained or life saved). Screening using clinical breast examination (CBE) or mammography among different age groups and at various frequencies was analyzed. Costs were expressed in international dollars (Int.$), the currency used by the World Health Organization, which has the same purchasing power in India as the US dollar has in the United States. To determine which factors influenced cost-effectiveness, sensitivity analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The estimated mortality reduction was the greatest for programs targeting women between age 40 and 60 years. Using a 3% discount rate, a single CBE at age 50 had an estimated cost-effectiveness ratio of Int.$793 per life year gained and a breast cancer mortality reduction of 2%. The cost-effectiveness ratio increased to Int.$1135 per life year gained for every-5-year CBE (age 40-60 years) and to Int.$1341 for biennial CBE (age 40-60 years); the corresponding reductions in breast cancer mortality were 8.2% and 16.3%, respectively. CBE performed annually from ages 40 to 60 was predicted to be nearly as efficacious as biennial mammography screening for reducing breast cancer mortality while incurring only half the net costs. The main factors affecting cost-effectiveness were breast cancer incidence, stage distribution, and cost savings on prevented palliative care.
CONCLUSION: The estimated cost-effectiveness of CBE screening for breast cancer in India compares favorably with that of mammography in developed countries. However, in view of competing priorities and economic conditions, the introduction of screening in India represents a greater challenge than it has been in more developed countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780864     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  43 in total

1.  The clinical breast exam: a skill that should not be abandoned.

Authors:  Teresa Bryan; Erin Snyder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  A review of systematic reviews of the cost-effectiveness of hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rima Tawk; Vassiki Sanogo; Vakaramoko Diaby; Hong Xiao; Alberto J Montero
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Genetic and clinical predictors for breast cancer risk assessment and stratification among Chinese women.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Wanqing Wen; Yu-Tang Gao; Yu Shyr; Ying Zheng; Jirong Long; Guoliang Li; Chun Li; Kai Gu; Qiuyin Cai; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Current Status and Future Projections of Breast Cancer in Asia.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Paul E Goss; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Regulation of IGF2 transcript and protein expression by altered methylation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Preetha J Shetty; Sireesha Movva; Nagarjuna Pasupuleti; Bhavani Vedicherlla; Kiran K Vattam; Sambasivan Venkatasubramanian; Yog R Ahuja; Qurratulain Hasan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Preventing breast cancer in LMICs via screening and/or early detection: The real and the surreal.

Authors:  Subhojit Dey
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 7.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Posttraumatic growth among cancer patients in India.

Authors:  Avinash Thombre; Allen C Sherman; Stephanie Simonton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-10-15

9.  Improving Breast Cancer Control via the Use of Community Health Workers in South Africa: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Brianna M Wadler; Christine M Judge; Marianne Prout; Jennifer D Allen; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Sibel Ö Gürdal; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Beyza Özcinar; A Nilüfer Özaydın; Arda Kayhan; Erkin Arıbal; Cennet Sahin; Pınar Saip; Oğuzhan Alagöz
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.