BACKGROUND: The implementation of folic acid fortification in the United States has resulted in unprecedented amounts of this synthetic form of folate in the American diet. Folic acid in circulation may be a useful measure of physiologic exposure to synthetic folic acid, and there is a potential for elevated concentrations after fortification and the possibility of adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of folic acid fortification on circulating concentrations of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study that used plasma samples from fasting subjects before and after fortification. Samples were measured for folate distribution with the use of an affinity-HPLC method with electrochemical detection. RESULTS: Among nonsupplement users, the median concentration of folic acid in plasma increased from 0.25 to 0.50 nmol/L (P < 0.001) after fortification, and among supplement users the median increased from 0.54 to 0.68 nmol/L (P = 0.001). Among nonsupplement users, the prevalence of high circulating folic acid (>/=85th percentile) increased from 9.4% to 19.1% (P = 0.002) after fortification. Among supplement users, the prevalence of high circulating folic acid increased from 15.9% to 24.3% (P = 0.02). Folic acid intake and total plasma folate were positively and significantly related to high circulating folic acid after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Folic acid fortification has resulted in increased exposure to circulating folic acid. The biochemical and physiologic consequences of this are unknown, but these findings highlight the need to understand the effects of chronic exposure to circulating folic acid.
BACKGROUND: The implementation of folic acid fortification in the United States has resulted in unprecedented amounts of this synthetic form of folate in the American diet. Folic acid in circulation may be a useful measure of physiologic exposure to synthetic folic acid, and there is a potential for elevated concentrations after fortification and the possibility of adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of folic acid fortification on circulating concentrations of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study that used plasma samples from fasting subjects before and after fortification. Samples were measured for folate distribution with the use of an affinity-HPLC method with electrochemical detection. RESULTS: Among nonsupplement users, the median concentration of folic acid in plasma increased from 0.25 to 0.50 nmol/L (P < 0.001) after fortification, and among supplement users the median increased from 0.54 to 0.68 nmol/L (P = 0.001). Among nonsupplement users, the prevalence of high circulating folic acid (>/=85th percentile) increased from 9.4% to 19.1% (P = 0.002) after fortification. Among supplement users, the prevalence of high circulating folic acid increased from 15.9% to 24.3% (P = 0.02). Folic acid intake and total plasma folate were positively and significantly related to high circulating folic acid after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Folic acid fortification has resulted in increased exposure to circulating folic acid. The biochemical and physiologic consequences of this are unknown, but these findings highlight the need to understand the effects of chronic exposure to circulating folic acid.
Authors: Aron M Troen; Breeana Mitchell; Bess Sorensen; Mark H Wener; Abbey Johnston; Brent Wood; Jacob Selhub; Anne McTiernan; Yutaka Yasui; Evrim Oral; John D Potter; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: J Nutr Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: John A Baron; Bernard F Cole; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; Dennis Ahnen; Robert Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Timothy R Church; John I Allen; Michael Beach; Gerald J Beck; John H Bond; Tim Byers; E Robert Greenberg; Jack S Mandel; Norman Marcon; Leila A Mott; Loretta Pearson; Fred Saibil; Rosalind U van Stolk Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jung Eun Lee; Walter C Willett; Charles S Fuchs; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Kana Wu; Jing Ma; Edward Giovannucci Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Josiane Steluti; Christina Reginaldo; Jacob Selhub; Ligi Paul; Regina Mara Fisberg; Dirce Maria Marchioni Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; Mindy Zhang; David A Lacher; Anne M Molloy; Tsunenobu Tamura; Elizabeth A Yetley; Mary-Frances Picciano; Clifford L Johnson Journal: J Nutr Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Regan L Bailey; James L Mills; Elizabeth A Yetley; Jaime J Gahche; Christine M Pfeiffer; Johanna T Dwyer; Kevin W Dodd; Christopher T Sempos; Joseph M Betz; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rima Obeid; Susanne H Kirsch; Sarah Dilmann; Cosima Klein; Rudolf Eckert; Jürgen Geisel; Wolfgang Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Eunyoung Cho; Xuehong Zhang; Mary K Townsend; Jacob Selhub; Ligi Paul; Bernard Rosner; Charles S Fuchs; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Mary R Sweeney; Anthony Staines; Leslie Daly; Aisling Traynor; Sean Daly; Steven W Bailey; Patricia B Alverson; June E Ayling; John M Scott Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 3.295