Literature DB >> 18778149

Conditioned nausea in rats: assessment by conditioned disgust reactions, rather than conditioned taste avoidance.

Linda A Parker1, Shadna A Rana, Cheryl L Limebeer.   

Abstract

The terms conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned taste aversion are often used interchangeably in the literature; however, considerable evidence indicates that they may represent different processes. Conditioned taste avoidance is measured by the amount that a rat drinks in a consumption test that includes both appetitive phases and consummatory phases of responding. However, conditioned taste aversion is more directly assessed using the taste reactivity (TR) test that includes only the consummatory phase of responding. Rats display a conditioned taste aversion as conditioned disgust reactions (gapes, chin rubs, and paw treads) during an intraoral infusion of a nausea-paired flavored solution. Only treatments that produce nausea produce conditioned disgust reactions, but even rewarding drugs produce conditioned taste avoidance. Furthermore, treatments that alleviate nausea prevent the establishment and the expression of conditioned disgust reactions, but they do not necessarily modify conditioned taste avoidance. Considerable evidence exists indicating that these two measures can be independent of one another. The potential of a compound to produce conditioned disgust reactions is a reflection of its nausea-inducing properties. Taste avoidance may be motivated by conditioned fear rather than conditioned nausea, but conditioned disgust is motivated by conditioned nausea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18778149     DOI: 10.1037/a0012531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  24 in total

1.  A novel peripherally restricted cannabinoid receptor antagonist, AM6545, reduces food intake and body weight, but does not cause malaise, in rodents.

Authors:  N L Cluny; V K Vemuri; A P Chambers; C L Limebeer; H Bedard; J T Wood; B Lutz; A Zimmer; L A Parker; A Makriyannis; K A Sharkey
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Anandamide transport inhibition by ARN272 attenuates nausea-induced behaviour in rats, and vomiting in shrews (Suncus murinus).

Authors:  L D O'Brien; C L Limebeer; E M Rock; G Bottegoni; D Piomelli; L A Parker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Cocaine decreases saccharin preference without altering sweet taste sensitivity.

Authors:  Jennifer K Roebber; Sari Izenwasser; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Profound reduction in sensitivity to the aversive effects of methamphetamine in mice bred for high methamphetamine intake.

Authors:  Shkelzen Shabani; Carrie S McKinnon; Christopher L Cunningham; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Inverse agonism of cannabinoid CB1 receptors potentiates LiCl-induced nausea in the conditioned gaping model in rats.

Authors:  C L Limebeer; V K Vemuri; H Bedard; S T Lang; K P Ossenkopp; A Makriyannis; L A Parker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Regulation of nausea and vomiting by cannabinoids.

Authors:  Linda A Parker; Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid reduces nausea-induced conditioned gaping in rats and vomiting in Suncus murinus.

Authors:  E M Rock; R L Kopstick; C L Limebeer; L A Parker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  The FAAH inhibitor URB-597 interferes with cisplatin- and nicotine-induced vomiting in the Suncus murinus (house musk shrew).

Authors:  L A Parker; C L Limebeer; E M Rock; D L Litt; M Kwiatkowska; D Piomelli
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  Effect of low doses of cannabidiolic acid and ondansetron on LiCl-induced conditioned gaping (a model of nausea-induced behaviour) in rats.

Authors:  E M Rock; L A Parker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  What is nausea? A historical analysis of changing views.

Authors:  Carey D Balaban; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.145

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.