Literature DB >> 22118879

Profound reduction in sensitivity to the aversive effects of methamphetamine in mice bred for high methamphetamine intake.

Shkelzen Shabani1, Carrie S McKinnon, Christopher L Cunningham, Tamara J Phillips.   

Abstract

Reduced sensitivity to aversive effects of methamphetamine (MA) may increase risk for MA abuse. Studies in two replicate sets of mouse lines that were selectively bred for high and low levels of MA intake support this view. Current studies examined the extent of insensitivity to aversive MA effects of mice bred for high levels of MA drinking. Conditioning procedures in which drugs are delivered shortly after cue exposure have been used to detect aversive drug effects and, in some cases, are more sensitive to such effects. Aversive effects induced by MA injected immediately after exposure to cues from two different sensory modalities were examined. In addition, effects of higher MA doses than those used previously were examined. MA-associated place conditioning utilized tactile cues, whereas MA-induced taste conditioning utilized a novel tastant. Second replicate, MA high drinking (MAHDR-2) and low drinking (MALDR-2) mice were treated with doses of MA up to 4 mg/kg. MAHDR-2 mice were insensitive to aversive effects of MA, except after place conditioning with the 4 mg/kg dose; MALDR-2 mice exhibited sensitivity to aversive effects of MA at doses as low as 1 mg/kg. These studies show that the expression of aversion is dependent upon procedure and MA dose, and that MAHDR-2 mice have markedly reduced sensitivity to the aversive effects of MA. The current and previous results support a strong genetic relationship between level of MA intake and level of sensitivity to aversive effects of MA, a factor that could impact risk for MA use in humans. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22118879      PMCID: PMC3297479          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  41 in total

1.  Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Laura E Tull; Kirsten E Rindal; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction.

Authors:  Alfred J Robison; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Voluntary ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice before and after sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol.

Authors:  C N Lessov; A A Palmer; E A Quick; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Ethanol-induced conditioned place aversion in mice.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; C M Henderson
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Quantitative analysis of selegiline and three metabolites (N-desmethylselegiline, methamphetamine, and amphetamine) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Matthew H Slawson; James L Taccogno; Rodger L Foltz; David E Moody
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in 15 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Julie Broadbent; Kathryn J Muccino; Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Intra-accumbens protein kinase C inhibitor NPC 15437 blocks amphetamine-produced conditioned place preference in rats.

Authors:  Harinder Aujla; Richard J Beninger
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Competition between ethanol-induced reward and aversion in place conditioning.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Rachel Smith; Carrie McMullin
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  High- and low-alcohol-preferring mice show differences in conditioned taste aversion to alcohol.

Authors:  Julia A Chester; Lawrence Lumeng; Ting-Kai Li; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 10.  Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Nikole K Ferree; MacKenzie A Howard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  29 in total

1.  Unique genetic factors influence sensitivity to the rewarding and aversive effects of methamphetamine versus cocaine.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Cheryl Reed; Carrie S McKinnon; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A genetic animal model of differential sensitivity to methamphetamine reinforcement.

Authors:  Shkelzen Shabani; Lauren K Dobbs; Matthew M Ford; Gregory P Mark; Deborah A Finn; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Impaired memory and reduced sensitivity to the circadian period lengthening effects of methamphetamine in mice selected for high methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  Reid H J Olsen; Charles N Allen; Victor A Derkach; Tamara J Phillips; John K Belknap; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake confers differential sensitivity to the temperature-altering effects of other addictive drugs.

Authors:  John R K Mootz; Nicholas B Miner; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Trace amine-associated receptor 1 regulation of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Nicholas B Miner; Josh S Elmore; Michael H Baumann; Tamara J Phillips; Aaron Janowsky
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.294

6.  Verification of a genetic locus for methamphetamine intake and the impact of morphine.

Authors:  Emily C Eastwood; Amy J Eshleman; Aaron Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Regulation of Methamphetamine Intake and Related Traits.

Authors:  John H Harkness; Xiao Shi; Aaron Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  A vaccine against methamphetamine attenuates its behavioral effects in mice.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Y Shen; Therese A Kosten; Angel Y Lopez; Berma M Kinsey; Thomas R Kosten; Frank M Orson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  A M Stafford; C Reed; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Prefrontal glutamate correlates of methamphetamine sensitization and preference.

Authors:  Kevin D Lominac; Sema G Quadir; Hannah M Barrett; Courtney L McKenna; Lisa M Schwartz; Paige N Ruiz; Melissa G Wroten; Rianne R Campbell; Bailey W Miller; John J Holloway; Katherine O Travis; Ganesh Rajasekar; Dan Maliniak; Andrew B Thompson; Lawrence E Urman; Tod E Kippin; Tamara J Phillips; Karen K Szumlinski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.