Literature DB >> 18777526

Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions.

Edward Ashton1, David Raunig, Chaan Ng, Fredrick Kelcz, Teresa McShane, Jeffrey Evelhoch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution to scan-rescan coefficient of variation (CV) of patient-specific arterial input function (AIF) measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data, and to determine whether any advantage or disadvantage to using a data-derived arterial input function is related to the anatomical location of the target lesion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two methods are presented for the calculation of perfusion parameters from DCE-MRI data using a two-compartment model. The first method makes use of a single-model AIF across all study data sets, while the second uses an automated process to derive an AIF specific to each data set. Both methods are applied to the analysis of a 25-subject scan-rescan study of patients with advanced solid tumors located in either the lungs or the liver. The parameters of interest in this study are the volume transfer constant between arterial plasma and extracellular extravascular space (Ktrans) and the blood-normalized initial area under the tumor enhancement curve over the first 90 seconds postinjection (IAUCBN90).
RESULTS: The use of a data-derived AIF reduces the visit-to-visit CV in both parameters for liver lesions by approximately 70% while the improvement is less than 20% for lung lesions.
CONCLUSION: The use of a data-derived AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data provides a substantial reduction in scan-rescan CV in the measurement of vascular parameters such as Ktrans and IAUCBN90. These results show a much larger advantage in the liver than in the lungs. However, this difference is largely driven by a small number of outliers, and may be spurious. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777526     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Aftab Alam Khan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Jacob Fluckiger; Gregory D Ayers; Xia Li; Sandeep N Gupta; Clare Tempany; Robert Mulkern; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer clinical trials: potential roles and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Rana R McKay; Clair J Beard; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Effects of flip angle uncertainty and noise on the accuracy of DCE-MRI metrics: comparison between standard concentration-based and signal difference methods.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Yiqun Xue; Xia Zhao; Jiangsheng Yu; Mark Rosen; Hee Kwon Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Impact of nonrigid motion correction technique on pixel-wise pharmacokinetic analysis of free-breathing pulmonary dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Junichi Tokuda; Hatsuho Mamata; Ritu R Gill; Nobuhiko Hata; Ron Kikinis; Robert F Padera; Robert E Lenkinski; David J Sugarbaker; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Tobias Penzkofer; Kyung Won Kim; Michelle S Hirsch; Mark G Vangel; Paul Masry; Trevor A Flood; Ming-Ching Chang; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern; Sandeep N Gupta
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Sharon Peled; Mark Vangel; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany; Fiona M Fennessy; Andrey Fedorov
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  DCE-MRI of the liver: effect of linear and nonlinear conversions on hepatic perfusion quantification and reproducibility.

Authors:  Shimon Aronhime; Claudia Calcagno; Guido H Jajamovich; Hadrien Arezki Dyvorne; Philip Robson; Douglas Dieterich; M Isabel Fiel; Valérie Martel-Laferriere; Manjil Chatterji; Henry Rusinek; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in clinical trials of treatment response in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; John C Gore
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Demonstration of DCE-MRI as an early pharmacodynamic biomarker of response to VEGF Trap in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Allison F O'Neill; Lei Qin; Patrick Y Wen; John F de Groot; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey T Yap
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.