Literature DB >> 18777191

Differences in perceptions of communication, tourism benefits, and management issues in a protected area of rural Kenya.

Brett L Bruyere1, Adam W Beh, Geoffrey Lelengula.   

Abstract

With record-breaking tourist visits in Kenya in 2005-2006, communities near the country's renowned protected areas must undertake or revisit planning efforts to conserve and enhance the region's natural, social, and economic resources. This article examines the differences between two stakeholder groups in the Samburu region of central Kenya: (1) protected area leadership and staff; and (2) members of the communities adjacent to the protected areas. Based on the results and analysis of 30 in-depth interviews, the authors identify differences between protected area staff and their community members regarding perceptions about communication between the two groups, and the economic benefits of tourism. The different stakeholders agreed, however, about challenges related to equitable distribution of tourism-based employment and revenue. The results indicate a need to reach consensus about what constitutes sufficient communication between national reserves and their community, and to what extent tourism-related revenue and employment should be distributed within the region. A discussion of the potential role of indicators and standards to make such decisions is presented.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777191     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9190-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? an empirical study from nepal.

Authors:  J N Mehta; J T Heinen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds?

Authors:  Agnes Kiss
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Social capital and fisheries management: the case of Chilika Lake in India.

Authors:  Nagothu Udaya Sekhar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Tackling the African "poverty trap": the Ijebu-Ode experiment.

Authors:  Akin L Mabogunje
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  FORUM: Is Ecotourism Sustainable?

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; Joris Aertsens; Inge Liekens; Steven Broekx; Leo De Nocker
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Local residents perception of benefits and losses from protected areas in India and Nepal.

Authors:  Krithi K Karanth; Sanjay K Nepal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Protected area staff and local community viewpoints: A qualitative assessment of conservation relationships in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga; Never Muboko; Edson Gandiwa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Attitudes Expressed in Online Comments about Environmental Factors in the Tourism Sector: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Jose Ramon Saura; Pedro Palos-Sanchez; Miguel Angel Rios Martin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Patterns of livestock depredation by tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India.

Authors:  Harendra Singh Bargali; Tanveer Ahmed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characterizing conflict between humans and big cats Panthera spp: A systematic review of research trends and management opportunities.

Authors:  Kathleen Krafte Holland; Lincoln R Larson; Robert B Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.