Literature DB >> 11443381

Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? an empirical study from nepal.

J N Mehta1, J T Heinen.   

Abstract

Like many developing countries, Nepal has adopted a community-based conservation (CBC) approach in recent years to manage its protected areas mainly in response to poor park-people relations. Among other things, under this approach the government has created new "people-oriented" conservation areas, formed and devolved legal authority to grassroots-level institutions to manage local resources, fostered infrastructure development, promoted tourism, and provided income-generating trainings to local people. Of interest to policy-makers and resource managers in Nepal and worldwide is whether this approach to conservation leads to improved attitudes on the part of local people. It is also important to know if personal costs and benefits associated with various intervention programs, and socioeconomic and demographic characteristics influence these attitudes. We explore these questions by looking at the experiences in Annapurna and Makalu-Barun Conservation Areas, Nepal, which have largely adopted a CBC approach in policy formulation, planning, and management. The research was conducted during 1996 and 1997; the data collection methods included random household questionnaire surveys, informal interviews, and review of official records and published literature. The results indicated that the majority of local people held favorable attitudes toward these conservation areas. Logistic regression results revealed that participation in training, benefit from tourism, wildlife depredation issue, ethnicity, gender, and education level were the significant predictors of local attitudes in one or the other conservation area. We conclude that the CBC approach has potential to shape favorable local attitudes and that these attitudes will be mediated by some personal attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443381     DOI: 10.1007/s002670010215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  20 in total

1.  Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: a survey of six southeastern Utah counties.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Durrant; J Matthew Shumway
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Pitfalls of CITES implementation in Nepal: a policy gap analysis.

Authors:  Yogesh Dongol; Joel T Heinen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Entangling the complexity of protected area management: the case of Wolong Biosphere Reserve, southwestern China.

Authors:  Bojie Fu; Kelin Wang; Yihe Lu; Shiliang Liu; Ma Keming; Liding Chen; Guohua Liu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Perceptions of a nearby exurban protected area in South Carolina, United States.

Authors:  David B Weaver; Laura J Lawton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Gender and urban perceptions of nature and protected areas in Bañados del Este biosphere reserve.

Authors:  Diego Martino
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Distribution of economic benefits from ecotourism: a case study of Wolong Nature Reserve For Giant Pandas in China.

Authors:  Guangming He; Xiaodong Chen; Wei Liu; Scott Bearer; Shiqiang Zhou; Lily Yeqing Cheng; Hemin Zhang; Zhiyun Ouyang; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 7.  Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements.

Authors:  Arian Spiteri; Sanjay K Nepalz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Differences in perceptions of communication, tourism benefits, and management issues in a protected area of rural Kenya.

Authors:  Brett L Bruyere; Adam W Beh; Geoffrey Lelengula
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Evaluating local benefits from conservation in Nepal's Annapurna Conservation Area.

Authors:  Arian Spiteri; Sanjay K Nepal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Local responses to participatory conservation in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal.

Authors:  Damodar Khadka; Sanjay K Nepal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.