Literature DB >> 18776952

Evaluation of Face Datasets as Tools for Assessing the Performance of Face Recognition Methods.

Lior Shamir1.   

Abstract

Face datasets are considered a primary tool for evaluating the efficacy of face recognition methods. Here we show that in many of the commonly used face datasets, face images can be recognized accurately at a rate significantly higher than random even when no face, hair or clothes features appear in the image. The experiments were done by cutting a small background area from each face image, so that each face dataset provided a new image dataset which included only seemingly blank images. Then, an image classification method was used in order to check the classification accuracy. Experimental results show that the classification accuracy ranged between 13.5% (color FERET) to 99% (YaleB). These results indicate that the performance of face recognition methods measured using face image datasets may be biased. Compilable source code used for this experiment is freely available for download via the internet.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18776952      PMCID: PMC2529479          DOI: 10.1007/s11263-008-0143-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Vis        ISSN: 0920-5691            Impact factor:   7.410


  7 in total

1.  Informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging.

Authors:  Jason R Swedlow; Ilya Goldberg; Erik Brauner; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  One-shot learning of object categories.

Authors:  Li Fei-Fei; Rob Fergus; Pietro Perona
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters.

Authors:  Simona E Grigorescu; Nicolai Petkov; Peter Kruizinga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  WND-CHARM: Multi-purpose image classification using compound image transforms.

Authors:  Nikita Orlov; Lior Shamir; Tomasz Macura; Josiah Johnston; D Mark Eckley; Ilya G Goldberg
Journal:  Pattern Recognit Lett       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  The Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model and XML file: open tools for informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging.

Authors:  Ilya G Goldberg; Chris Allan; Jean-Marie Burel; Doug Creager; Andrea Falconi; Harry Hochheiser; Josiah Johnston; Jeff Mellen; Peter K Sorger; Jason R Swedlow
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 6.  A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images.

Authors:  Karsten Rodenacker; Ewert Bengtsson
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  Why is real-world visual object recognition hard?

Authors:  Nicolas Pinto; David D Cox; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  A computer analysis method for correlating knee X-rays with continuous indicators.

Authors:  Lior Shamir
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Automatic morphological classification of galaxy images.

Authors:  Lior Shamir
Journal:  Mon Not R Astron Soc       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 5.287

3.  Hierarchical recognition scheme for human facial expression recognition systems.

Authors:  Muhammad Hameed Siddiqi; Sungyoung Lee; Young-Koo Lee; Adil Mehmood Khan; Phan Tran Ho Truc
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  A high-throughput screening approach to discovering good forms of biologically inspired visual representation.

Authors:  Nicolas Pinto; David Doukhan; James J DiCarlo; David D Cox
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The Need for Careful Data Collection for Pattern Recognition in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Raphaël Marée
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.