AIM: The study examined the role of the motor cortex in the control of human standing. METHODS: Subjects (n = 15) stood quietly with or without body support. The supported standing condition enabled subjects to stand with a reduced amount of postural sway. Peripheral electrical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) was applied to elicit a soleus (SOL) H-reflex, or motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the SOL and the tibialis anterior (TA). Trials were grouped based on the standing condition (i.e. supported vs. normal) as well as sway direction (i.e. forward and backward) while subjects were standing normally. RESULTS: During normal when compared to supported standing, the SOL H-reflex was depressed (-11 +/- 4%), while the TMS-evoked MEPs from the SOL and TA were facilitated (35 +/- 11% for the SOL, 51 +/- 15% for the TA). TES-evoked SOL and TA MEPs were, however, not different between the normal and supported standing conditions. The data based on sway direction indicated that the SOL H-reflex, as well as the SOL TMS- and TES-evoked MEPs were all greater during forward when compared to backward sway. In contrast, the TMS- and TES-evoked MEPs from the TA were smaller when swaying forward as compared to backward. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated the presence of an enhanced cortical excitability because of the need to control for postural sway during normal standing. The increased cortical excitability was, however, unlikely to be involved in an on-going control of postural sway, suggesting that postural sway is controlled at the spinal and/or subcortical levels.
AIM: The study examined the role of the motor cortex in the control of human standing. METHODS: Subjects (n = 15) stood quietly with or without body support. The supported standing condition enabled subjects to stand with a reduced amount of postural sway. Peripheral electrical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) was applied to elicit a soleus (SOL) H-reflex, or motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the SOL and the tibialis anterior (TA). Trials were grouped based on the standing condition (i.e. supported vs. normal) as well as sway direction (i.e. forward and backward) while subjects were standing normally. RESULTS: During normal when compared to supported standing, the SOL H-reflex was depressed (-11 +/- 4%), while the TMS-evoked MEPs from the SOL and TA were facilitated (35 +/- 11% for the SOL, 51 +/- 15% for the TA). TES-evoked SOL and TA MEPs were, however, not different between the normal and supported standing conditions. The data based on sway direction indicated that the SOL H-reflex, as well as the SOL TMS- and TES-evoked MEPs were all greater during forward when compared to backward sway. In contrast, the TMS- and TES-evoked MEPs from the TA were smaller when swaying forward as compared to backward. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated the presence of an enhanced cortical excitability because of the need to control for postural sway during normal standing. The increased cortical excitability was, however, unlikely to be involved in an on-going control of postural sway, suggesting that postural sway is controlled at the spinal and/or subcortical levels.
Authors: Craig D Tokuno; Martin Keller; Mark G Carpenter; Gonzalo Márquez; Wolfgang Taube Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Shailesh S Kantak; George F Wittenberg; Wan-Wen Liao; Laurence S Magder; Mark W Rogers; Sandy McCombe Waller Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 3.046