Literature DB >> 18774616

The BUMP model of response planning: variable horizon predictive control accounts for the speed-accuracy tradeoffs and velocity profiles of aimed movement.

Robin T Bye1, Peter D Neilson.   

Abstract

The BUMP model is a comprehensive discrete-time computational model of response planning. Developed within the Adaptive Model Theory framework, it is based on intermittent optimal control. The theory posits a basic unit of motor production (BUMP) that is determined by a planning system that operates intermittently at fixed intervals of time. Given sensory information about the position and velocity of the actual response as well as the predicted future state of the target, the response planning system generates an optimal response trajectory to reach the predicted future state of the target and to compensate for executional error. The ability to vary the duration, or prediction horizon, of the trajectory gives rise to the concept of variable horizon predictive control. We propose that the combination of signal-dependent noise in the nervous system and variable horizon predictive control accounts for the well-known speed-accuracy tradeoffs and velocity profiles in aimed movements. Conducting a simulation study, we found that on one extreme of variable horizon control, a receding horizon strategy reproduced Fitts' law and corresponding asymmetrical velocity profiles. On the other extreme, a fixed horizon strategy reproduced the linear tradeoff and corresponding symmetrical velocity profiles. We conclude that the BUMP model provides a unifying theoretical bridge between speed-accuracy tradeoffs and the accompanying velocity profiles of aimed movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18774616     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  10 in total

1.  Planning multiple movements within a fixed time limit: the cost of constrained time allocation in a visuo-motor task.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Shih-Wei Wu; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Two-phase model of the basal ganglia: implications for discontinuous control of the motor system.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Three-Dimensional Binocular Visual Perception.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Signal-independent noise in intracortical brain-computer interfaces causes movement time properties inconsistent with Fitts' law.

Authors:  Francis R Willett; Brian A Murphy; William D Memberg; Christine H Blabe; Chethan Pandarinath; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Jonathan P Miller; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch; A Bolu Ajiboye
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Identification of intermittent control in man and machine.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Cornelis van de Kamp; Henrik Gollee; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Synergy Selection for Visually-Guided Movement.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

7.  The minimum transition hypothesis for intermittent hierarchical motor control.

Authors:  Amir Karniel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Refractoriness in sustained visuo-manual control: is the refractory duration intrinsic or does it depend on external system properties?

Authors:  Cornelis van de Kamp; Peter J Gawthrop; Henrik Gollee; Ian D Loram
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Interfacing sensory input with motor output: does the control architecture converge to a serial process along a single channel?

Authors:  Cornelis van de Kamp; Peter J Gawthrop; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Human Gait Control Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Based on Controlling the Shank Dynamics.

Authors:  Zohre Rezaee; Hamid Reza Kobravi
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.