Literature DB >> 18774602

Cytotoxic effects of dental bonding substances as a function of degree of conversion.

Alexander Franz1, Franz König, Trevor Lucas, David C Watts, Andreas Schedle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recently, we found that dental bonding substances tested alone or in combination with composites are far more cytotoxic than composite materials alone. These data are in line with several cytotoxicity reports but contradict in vivo studies showing the beneficial effects of bonding materials. The aims of the present study were to develop a preparation method for composite specimens modelling conditions in the oral cavity and to analyse the influence of bonding substances on the cytotoxicity of six different composite materials.
METHODS: Cylindrical composite specimens were prepared in polyethylene blocks containing 5 mm diameter cylindrical holes (cylinder height 2 mm), covered with a polyethylene foil and light cured from one end for 40 s. In a second series of experiments, composite specimens were combined with bonding materials. Bonding was applied onto the polyethylene foil in one or two layers and light cured according to the manufacturers' instructions. Subsequently, polyethylene moulds were placed on top of the bonding materials and composites prepared as described above. After unilateral light curing from the top of the cylindrical holes, visual confirmation of adherence at the base was obtained. Specimens were added to the cultures immediately after production or after preincubation for 7 days under cell culture conditions. Specimens were incubated with L-929 fibroblasts for 72 h and cell numbers determined by flow cytometry. To evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of bonding materials cured with and without air inhibition a third series of experiments was performed. FTIR spectroscopic measurements were made on thin-films of dentin-bonding agents, cured under both an-aerobic and aerobic conditions, to determine degree of conversion.
RESULTS: Cytotoxicities of all six tested composites were significantly different (p<0.0001) and diminished after 7 days of preincubation (p<0.0001). Bonding substances had no statistically significant influence on the cytotoxicity of composite materials (p=0.159). A highly significant statistical reduction in the degree of conversion for each resin cured under air inhibition conditions was documented (p<0.01). SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates that cell culture toxicity data are highly model dependent and that internationally standardized test protocols for toxicity screening of dental materials in line with the existing standards are clearly needed to obtain comparable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18774602     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  10 in total

1.  Resin cements formulated with thio-urethanes can strengthen porcelain and increase bond strength to ceramics.

Authors:  Atais Bacchi; Aloisio Oro Spazzin; Gabriel Rodrigues de Oliveira; Carmem Pfeifer; Paulo Francisco Cesar
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Bioactive polymeric composites for tooth mineral regeneration: physicochemical and cellular aspects.

Authors:  Drago Skrtic; Joseph M Antonucci
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2011-09-14

Review 3.  Molecular toxicology of substances released from resin-based dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Athina Bakopoulou; Triantafillos Papadopoulos; Pavlos Garefis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Toxicity of a dental adhesive compared with ionizing radiation and zoledronic acid.

Authors:  Miguel Alcaraz; Amparo Olivares; Daniel-Giyngiri Achel; Emilio García-Cruz; Adriana Fondevilla-Soler; Manuel Canteras-Jordana
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Influence of light-curing distance on degree of conversion and cytotoxicity of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Florian J Wegehaupt; Nancy Lunghi; Georgios N Belibasakis; Thomas Attin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods.

Authors:  Myung-Jin Lee; Mi-Joo Kim; Jae-Sung Kwon; Sang-Bae Lee; Kwang-Mahn Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Physical-chemical characterization and bond strength to zirconia of dental adhesives with different monomer mixtures and photoinitiator systems light-activated with poly and monowave devices.

Authors:  Constantino Fernandes Neto; Mayara Hana Narimatsu; Pedro Henrique Magão; Reginaldo Mendonça da Costa; Carmem Silvia Pfeifer; Adilson Yoshio Furuse
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2022-04-28

8.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assessment of an Orthodontic Composite Containing Titanium-dioxide Nano-particles.

Authors:  Farzin Heravi; Mohammad Ramezani; Maryam Poosti; Mohsen Hosseini; Arezoo Shajiei; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2013-12-18

9.  Influence of light-curing mode on the cytotoxicity of resin-based surface sealants.

Authors:  Florian J Wegehaupt; Tobias T Tauböck; Thomas Attin; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Sorption, solubility and cytotoxicity of novel antibacterial nanofilled dental adhesive resins.

Authors:  Fernando Luis Esteban Florez; Hannah Kraemer; Rochelle Denise Hiers; Catharina Marques Sacramento; Adam Justin Rondinone; Karina Gonzales Silvério; Sharukh S Khajotia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.