Literature DB >> 18773062

Diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

B E Van Beers1.   

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is suspected based on signs of biliary obstruction, abnormal liver function tests, elevated tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen), and ultrasonography showing a bile stricture or a mass, especially in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) is performed for the diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinomas. However, differentiation of an intraductal cholangiocarcinoma from a hypovascular metastasis is limited at imaging. Therefore, reasonable exclusion of an extrahepatic primary tumor should be performed. Differentiating between benign and malignant bile duct stricture is also difficult, except when metastases are observed. The sensitivity of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is limited in small, infiltrative, and mucinous cholangiocarcinomas. When the diagnosis of a biliary stenosis remains indeterminate at MRI or CT, endoscopic imaging (endoscopic or intraductal ultrasound, cholangioscopy, or optical coherence tomography) and tissue sampling should be carried out. Tissue sampling has a high specificity for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures, but sensitivity is low. The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is particularly challenging in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. These patients should be followed with yearly tumor markers, CT, or MRI. In the case of dominant stricture, histological or cytological confirmation of cholangiocarcinoma should be obtained. More studies are needed to compare the accuracy of the various imaging methods, especially the new intraductal methods, and the imaging features of malignancy should be standardized.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18773062      PMCID: PMC2504383          DOI: 10.1080/13651820801992716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  76 in total

1.  Proteomic profiling of cholangiocarcinoma: diagnostic potential of SELDI-TOF MS in malignant bile duct stricture.

Authors:  Christopher J Scarlett; Alex J Saxby; AiQun Nielsen; Cameron Bell; Jaswinder S Samra; Thomas Hugh; Robert C Baxter; Ross C Smith
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract.

Authors:  F Zandrino; P Curone; L Benzi; M L Ferretti; F Musante
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004-11-17

3.  A new mucin antibody/enzyme-linked lectin-sandwich assay of serum MUC5AC mucin for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wichuda Bamrungphon; Nalinee Prempracha; Nophawan Bunchu; Samreung Rangdaeng; Trichak Sandhu; Songphol Srisukho; Chanchai Boonla; Sopit Wongkham
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant idiopathic biliary strictures: are we there yet?

Authors:  Alberto Larghi; Irving Waxman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: risk factors and clinical presentation.

Authors:  K M Boberg; A Bergquist; S Mitchell; A Pares; F Rosina; U Broomé; R Chapman; O Fausa; T Egeland; G Rocca; E Schrumpf
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Cytokeratin 7 and 20 expression in cholangiocarcinomas varies along the biliary tract but still differs from that in colorectal carcinoma metastasis.

Authors:  A Rullier; B Le Bail; R Fawaz; J F Blanc; J Saric; P Bioulac-Sage
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Dynamic FDG-PET is useful for detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC listed for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hanne Prytz; Susanne Keiding; Einar Björnsson; Ulrika Broomé; Sven Almer; Maria Castedal; Ole Lajord Munk
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures.

Authors:  Thomas Rösch; Alexander Meining; Silke Frühmorgen; Christian Zillinger; Volker Schusdziarra; Karin Hellerhoff; Meinhard Classen; Hermann Helmberger
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography.

Authors:  S Stavropoulos; A Larghi; E Verna; P Battezzati; P Stevens
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Differential diagnosis of stenosing lesions at the hepatic hilus.

Authors:  Jonathan Koea; Andrew Holden; Kai Chau; John McCall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Congenital hepatic fibrosis and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Arvind Srinath; Benjamin L Shneider
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 2.  Preneoplastic conditions underlying bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Lena Sibulesky; Justin Nguyen; Tushar Patel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Cholangiocarcinoma following external beam radiotherapy: A report of two cases.

Authors:  Anisha Kulkarni; Justin S Gundara; Anthony J Gill; Thomas J Hugh; Jaswinder S Samra
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Perioperative Management of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine E Poruk; Timothy M Pawlik; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Role of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, Cholangioscopic Biopsies, and EUS-FNA in the Evaluation of Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Christian Brooks; Valerie Gausman; Chanthel Kokoy-Mondragon; Khushboo Munot; Sunil P Amin; Amit Desai; Claudine Kipp; John Poneros; Amrita Sethi; Frank G Gress; Michel Kahaleh; Vundavalli V Murty; Reem Sharaiha; Tamas A Gonda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The risk factors and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher A Wadsworth; Adrian Lim; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Shahid A Khan
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance evaluations of biliary malignancy and condition at high-risk for biliary malignancy: Current status.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-27

8.  Novel Potential Biomarkers for Opisthorchis viverrini Infection and Associated Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nithikoon Aksorn; Sittiruk Roytrakul; Suthathip Kittisenachai; Kawin Leelawat; Pithi Chanvorachote; Supachai Topanurak; Shinjiro Hamano; Usa Lek-Uthai
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Proteomic studies of cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cell secretomes.

Authors:  Chantragan Srisomsap; Phannee Sawangareetrakul; Pantipa Subhasitanont; Daranee Chokchaichamnankit; Khajeelak Chiablaem; Vaharabhongsa Bhudhisawasdi; Sopit Wongkham; Jisnuson Svasti
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12-27

10.  Detection of serum MMP-7 and MMP-9 in cholangiocarcinoma patients: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Kawin Leelawat; Sompong Sakchinabut; Siriluck Narong; Jerasak Wannaprasert
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.