Literature DB >> 18772311

The majority of multipotent epidermal stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetrical chromosome segregation.

Panagiota A Sotiropoulou1, Aurélie Candi, Cédric Blanpain.   

Abstract

The maintenance of genome integrity in stem cells (SCs) is critical for preventing cancer formation and cellular senescence. The immortal strand hypothesis postulates that SCs protect their genome by keeping the same DNA strand throughout life by asymmetrical cell divisions, thus avoiding accumulation of mutations that can arise during DNA replication. The in vivo relevance of this model remains to date a matter of intense debate. In this study, we revisited this long-standing hypothesis, by analyzing how multipotent hair follicle (HF) SCs segregate their DNA strands during morphogenesis, skin homeostasis, and SC activation. We used three different in vivo approaches to determine how HF SCs segregate their DNA strand during cell divisions. Double-labeling studies using pulse-chase experiments during morphogenesis and the first adult hair cycle showed that HF SCs incorporate two different nucleotide analogs, contradictory to the immortal strand hypothesis. The co-segregation of DNA and chromatin labeling during pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that label retention in HF SCs is rather a mark of relative quiescence. Moreover, DNA labeling of adult SCs, similar to labeling during morphogenesis, also resulted in label retention in HF SCs, indicating that chromosome segregation occurs randomly in most of these cells. Altogether, our results demonstrate that DNA strand segregation occurs randomly in the majority of HF SCs during development, tissue homeostasis, and following SC activation. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18772311     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  35 in total

1.  Development and homeostasis of the skin epidermis.

Authors:  Panagiota A Sotiropoulou; Cedric Blanpain
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Stem cell ageing and non-random chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Gregory W Charville; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  DNA asymmetry in stem cells - immortal or mortal?

Authors:  Swathi Yadlapalli; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Regenerating the skin: a task for the heterogeneous stem cell pool and surrounding niche.

Authors:  Guiomar Solanas; Salvador Aznar Benitah
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart?

Authors:  Shahragim Tajbakhsh; Cayetano Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Lgr5 intestinal stem cells have high telomerase activity and randomly segregate their chromosomes.

Authors:  Arnout G Schepers; Robert Vries; Maaike van den Born; Marc van de Wetering; Hans Clevers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Label retaining cells and cutaneous stem cells.

Authors:  Vasily V Terskikh; Andrey V Vasiliev; Ekaterina A Vorotelyak
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 8.  Random chromosome segregation in mouse intestinal epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  Catherine Legraverend; Philippe Jay
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer.

Authors:  Ralph A Neumüller; Juergen A Knoblich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Microenvironmental modulation of asymmetric cell division in human lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Sharon R Pine; Bríd M Ryan; Lyuba Varticovski; Ana I Robles; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.