Literature DB >> 18769807

[Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].

Enrique Norero1, Blanca Norero, Alvaro Huete, Fernando Pimentel, Francisco Cruz, Luis Ibáñez, Jorge Martínez, Nicolás Jarufe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography MRCP) is a non-invasive diagnostic method for choledocholithiasis. AIM: To evaluate the results of MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of MRCP reports performed between October 2001 and December 2004. We included patients with suspected choledocholithiasis who were studied with MRCP and some other confirmatory test such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP), surgical common bile duct exploration or transcystic colangiography TC).
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty five patients aged 58+/-20 years 70 females) were included. In 54 patients 43%) we compared the results of MRCP with the findings of surgical common bile duct exploration or TC and in 71 57%) we did so with ERCP. MRCP suggested choledocholithiasis in 93 patients and in 32 it was negative. Eighty six 67%) patients had choledocholithiasis according to TC or ERCP, including 3 patients who had a negative MRCP. Therefore the sensibility was 97%, specificity 74% positive predictive value 89%, negative predictive value 90% and accuracy of MRCP was 90% for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
CONCLUSIONS: MRCP has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769807     DOI: /S0034-98872008000500008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Chil        ISSN: 0034-9887            Impact factor:   0.553


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Katherine Davis; Richard Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

4.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Francesco A Polistina; Mauro Frego; Marco Bisello; Emy Manzi; Antonella Vardanega; Bortolo Perin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28

5.  CT vs. MRCP in choledocholithiasis jaundice.

Authors:  I Petrescu; A M Bratu; S Petrescu; B V Popa; D Cristian; T Burcos
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Diagnostic role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in evaluation of obstructive biliopathies and correlating it with final diagnosis and clinical profile of patients.

Authors:  Umesh Chandra Parashari; Sachin Khanduri; Samarjit Bhadury; Deepika Upadhyay; Kaushal Kishore
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.