Literature DB >> 18768677

Cancer Quality Alliance: Blueprint for a better cancer care system.

Christopher Rose1, Ellen Stovall, Patricia A Ganz, Christopher Desch, Maria Hewitt.   

Abstract

The Cancer Quality Alliance (CQA), a national alliance advocating for improvements in the quality of cancer care in America, presents a set of 5 case studies that depict a vision of quality cancer care and a "Blueprint" for actions to realize this vision. The CQA Blueprint case studies feature patients with soft tissue sarcoma, breast cancer, rectal cancer, and Hodgkin disease and focus on key phases in the cancer care trajectory: detection, diagnosis, treatment, post-treatment/survivorship, and end of life. Each case study begins with a patient summary, follows with a worst- and a best-case scenario, and concludes with a discussion section identifying "what went right" in the best case and "what went wrong" in the worst case. Steps to be taken by key stakeholders, for example, health care providers, insurers/payers, policy makers, and patients and families, are then outlined. By juxtaposing a worst- and best-case scenario, the cancer care case studies elucidate the origins of complex health care problems and clarify the actions needed to overcome them. The CQA will make the case studies available for use as teaching tools to give health care providers and patients themselves descriptions of how the health care system should work to achieve the ultimate benefit for an individual living with, through, and beyond a diagnosis of cancer. The CQA adopted the definition of quality health care of the Institute of Medicine, and the analysis of care provided in the discussion section of each case study is framed using 6 quality improvement aims identified in the Institute of Medicine's report, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Health care quality may be judged according to its safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768677     DOI: 10.3322/CA.2008.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  8 in total

1.  Victimized again?

Authors:  John V Cox
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Multidisciplinary cancer management: a systems-based approach to deliver complex care.

Authors:  Joseph O Jacobson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship: Advocacy for Quality Cancer Care.

Authors:  Ellen Stovall
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Metrics for evaluating patient navigation during cancer diagnosis and treatment: crafting a policy-relevant research agenda for patient navigation in cancer care.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel Dohan; Peter Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Engaging patients and their partners in preventive health behaviors: the physician factor.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Kimberly A Mallett; Rob Turrisi; Jerod Stapleton
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-04

Review 6.  Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Aggressiveness of cancer treatment in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit.

Authors:  C Luthy; A Pugliesi; E Rapiti; M Kossovsky; P Y Dietrich; C Cedraschi; A F Allaz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Bioactive food components, inflammatory targets, and cancer prevention.

Authors:  Young S Kim; Matthew R Young; Gerd Bobe; Nancy H Colburn; John A Milner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-03-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.