Literature DB >> 25077805

Aggressiveness of cancer treatment in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit.

C Luthy1, A Pugliesi, E Rapiti, M Kossovsky, P Y Dietrich, C Cedraschi, A F Allaz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed at determining the aggressiveness of chemotherapy (CT)in patients hospitalized in a supportive care unit (focusing on mortality, patient profiles, survival, readmissions, and CT near death).
METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 247 consecutive patients were investigated at the admission (disease, treatments, oncologist's theoretical survival prognosis, internist's clinical global impression (CGI)). A 3-and 6-month follow-up was performed. Survival was assessed up to 3 years.
RESULTS: Various cancer diagnoses were represented in polymorbid patients. Since disease onset, 69.6 % had received a first line of CT only; 147 patients (59.5 %) had CT at the admission; median CGI was 3 (range = 0-10); and theoretical survival prognosis was <12 months in 65.2 %. In-hospital mortality rate was 21 %. Odds of receiving CT was inversely associated with age (OR for patients ≥ 71 years vs. patients <50 years 0.19; 95 % CI 0.06-0.65; p = 0.02) and number of previous CT lines (OR for patients with 2-4 lines vs. those with 1 line 0.14; 95 % CI 0.06-0.34; p = 0.000). In the multi-adjusted model, 6-month survival remained associated with CT at the admission (HR 1.86; 95 % CI 1.31-2.65; p = 0.001), CGI (per point HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.73-0.96; p = 0.013), and theoretical survival prognosis (per category HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.44-0.66; p = 0.000). Very few patients needed readmission related to CT's adverse effects. From admission and throughout follow-up, 24 patients (9.7 %) had received CT during their last 14 days of life.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that a supportive care program can benefit a heterogeneous population as it contributes to assess clinical risks and benefits of CT and prevent aggressive care near death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25077805     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

1.  Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  A M The; T Hak; G Koëter; G van Der Wal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

2.  Chemotherapy given near the end of life by community oncologists for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jose R Murillo; Jim Koeller
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

3.  Bending the cost curve in cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 7.  Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer.

Authors:  Robin Matsuyama; Sashidhar Reddy; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Challenging the 10-year rule: The accuracy of patient life expectancy predictions by physicians in relation to prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Kevin M Y B Leung; Wilma M Hopman; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Glare; Kiran Virik; Mark Jones; Malcolm Hudson; Steffen Eychmuller; John Simes; Nicholas Christakis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

10.  Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team.

Authors:  E MacDermid; G Hooton; M MacDonald; G McKay; D Grose; N Mohammed; C Porteous
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.