PURPOSE: Before the implementation of the WHO lymphoma classification system, disagreement about pathologic diagnosis was common. We sought to estimate the impact of expert review in the modern era by comparing final pathologic diagnoses at five comprehensive cancer centers with diagnoses assigned at referring centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) database with a documented pathologic diagnosis before presentation and a final pathologic diagnosis of any of five common B-cell NHLs were eligible. After central review of discordant cases, we estimated the rate of pathologic concordance, then investigated the etiology of discordance as well its potential impact on prognosis and treatment. RESULTS: The overall pathologic discordance rate was 6% (43 of 731 patients; 95% CI, 4% to 8%). For the majority of cases in which the referring diagnosis was apparently final, no additional studies were conducted at the NCCN center, and the change in diagnosis reflected a different interpretation of existing data. Concordance was highest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (95%) and follicular lymphoma (FL; grades 1, 2, and not otherwise specified, 95%) and lowest for grade 3 FL (88%). Of the 43 pathologically discordant cases, 81% (35 patients) might have experienced a change in treatment as a result of the pathologic reclassification. CONCLUSION: In the era of the WHO lymphoma classification system, the majority of common B-cell NHLs diagnosed in the community were unchanged by second opinion review by an expert hematopathologist. However, for one patient in 20, there was a discordance in diagnosis that could have altered therapy.
PURPOSE: Before the implementation of the WHO lymphoma classification system, disagreement about pathologic diagnosis was common. We sought to estimate the impact of expert review in the modern era by comparing final pathologic diagnoses at five comprehensive cancer centers with diagnoses assigned at referring centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) database with a documented pathologic diagnosis before presentation and a final pathologic diagnosis of any of five common B-cell NHLs were eligible. After central review of discordant cases, we estimated the rate of pathologic concordance, then investigated the etiology of discordance as well its potential impact on prognosis and treatment. RESULTS: The overall pathologic discordance rate was 6% (43 of 731 patients; 95% CI, 4% to 8%). For the majority of cases in which the referring diagnosis was apparently final, no additional studies were conducted at the NCCN center, and the change in diagnosis reflected a different interpretation of existing data. Concordance was highest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (95%) and follicular lymphoma (FL; grades 1, 2, and not otherwise specified, 95%) and lowest for grade 3 FL (88%). Of the 43 pathologically discordant cases, 81% (35 patients) might have experienced a change in treatment as a result of the pathologic reclassification. CONCLUSION: In the era of the WHO lymphoma classification system, the majority of common B-cell NHLs diagnosed in the community were unchanged by second opinion review by an expert hematopathologist. However, for one patient in 20, there was a discordance in diagnosis that could have altered therapy.
Authors: Lindsay M Morton; Sophia S Wang; Susan S Devesa; Patricia Hartge; Dennis D Weisenburger; Martha S Linet Journal: Blood Date: 2005-09-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: N L Harris; E S Jaffe; J Diebold; G Flandrin; H K Muller-Hermelink; J Vardiman; T A Lister; C D Bloomfield Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: F Dick; S VanLier; P Banks; G Frizzera; G Witrak; R Gibson; G Everett; L Schuman; P Isacson; G O'Conor Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: E Z Ezdinli; W Costello; L P Wasser; R E Lenhard; C W Berard; R Hartsock; J M Bennett; P P Carbone Journal: Cancer Date: 1979-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa M Rimsza; Hongli Li; Rita M Braziel; Catherine M Spier; Daniel O Persky; Jennifer Dunlap; Michael LeBlanc; Nancy Bartlett; John P Leonard; Sonali M Smith; Oliver W Press; Jonathan W Friedberg Journal: Haematologica Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Alexandra M Levine; Ariela Noy; Jeannette Y Lee; Wayne Tam; Juan Carlos Ramos; David H Henry; Samir Parekh; Erin G Reid; Ronald Mitsuyasu; Timothy Cooley; Bruce J Dezube; Lee Ratner; Ethel Cesarman; Anil Tulpule Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonathan W Friedberg; Michelle Byrtek; Brian K Link; Christopher Flowers; Michael Taylor; John Hainsworth; James R Cerhan; Andrew D Zelenetz; Jamie Hirata; Thomas P Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Casulo; B Day; K L Dawson; X Zhou; C R Flowers; C M Farber; J D Hainsworth; J R Cerhan; B K Link; A D Zelenetz; J W Friedberg Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976