PURPOSE: Infusional chemotherapy is efficacious in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma, but it may be difficult to administer. We studied standard agents with rituximab plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DR-COP) in an attempt to provide a more practical approach to therapy while ascertaining rates of response, potential infectious complications, and prognostic role of biologic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial, employing (day 1) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), rituximab 375 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (not > 2 mg), and prednisone 100 mg orally on days 1 through 5, with concomitant antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: In 40 evaluable patients, median CD4 cells was 114/μL (range, 5 to 1,026/μL), and median HIV-1 viral load (VL) was 25,000 copies/mL. High or intermediate/high age-adjusted International Prognostic Index was present in 28%. Overall response was 67.5%, with complete remission in 47.5% (95% CI, 31.5 to 63.9). Of 19 complete responders, 84% had extranodal disease, 47% had CD4 < 100/μL, and 47% had VL > 50,000 copies/mL; one relapsed. With 25.5-month median follow-up, 62% (95% CI, 44 to 75) of patients remain alive. Sixteen patients (40%) experienced 22 infections, with grade 4 in only two (5%). No patient died as a result of infection during treatment; one had opportunistic infection. CONCLUSION: Profound immunodeficiency and high HIV-1 viral load do not preclude attainment of complete response after DR-COP with highly active antiretroviral therapy. The regimen is tolerable, and use of rituximab was not associated with death as a result of infection during treatment. This approach may be useful in patients in whom the more intensive infusional regimens are impractical.
PURPOSE: Infusional chemotherapy is efficacious in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma, but it may be difficult to administer. We studied standard agents with rituximab plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DR-COP) in an attempt to provide a more practical approach to therapy while ascertaining rates of response, potential infectious complications, and prognostic role of biologic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial, employing (day 1) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), rituximab 375 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (not > 2 mg), and prednisone 100 mg orally on days 1 through 5, with concomitant antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: In 40 evaluable patients, median CD4 cells was 114/μL (range, 5 to 1,026/μL), and median HIV-1 viral load (VL) was 25,000 copies/mL. High or intermediate/high age-adjusted International Prognostic Index was present in 28%. Overall response was 67.5%, with complete remission in 47.5% (95% CI, 31.5 to 63.9). Of 19 complete responders, 84% had extranodal disease, 47% had CD4 < 100/μL, and 47% had VL > 50,000 copies/mL; one relapsed. With 25.5-month median follow-up, 62% (95% CI, 44 to 75) of patients remain alive. Sixteen patients (40%) experienced 22 infections, with grade 4 in only two (5%). No patient died as a result of infection during treatment; one had opportunistic infection. CONCLUSION: Profound immunodeficiency and high HIV-1 viral load do not preclude attainment of complete response after DR-COP with highly active antiretroviral therapy. The regimen is tolerable, and use of rituximab was not associated with death as a result of infection during treatment. This approach may be useful in patients in whom the more intensive infusional regimens are impractical.
Authors: C Visco; Y Li; Z Y Xu-Monette; R N Miranda; T M Green; Y Li; A Tzankov; W Wen; W-m Liu; B S Kahl; E S G d'Amore; S Montes-Moreno; K Dybkær; A Chiu; W Tam; A Orazi; Y Zu; G Bhagat; J N Winter; H-Y Wang; S O'Neill; C H Dunphy; E D Hsi; X F Zhao; R S Go; W W L Choi; F Zhou; M Czader; J Tong; X Zhao; J H van Krieken; Q Huang; W Ai; J Etzell; M Ponzoni; A J M Ferreri; M A Piris; M B Møller; C E Bueso-Ramos; L J Medeiros; L Wu; K H Young Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: C Haioun; C Besson; E Lepage; C Thieblemont; D Simon; C Rose; H Tilly; A Sonet; P Lederlin; M Attal; J Brière; F Reyes Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A Rahman; S R Husain; J Siddiqui; M Verma; M Agresti; M Center; A R Safa; R I Glazer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-12-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kim Linton; Christopher Howarth; Mark Wappett; Gillian Newton; Cynthia Lachel; Javeed Iqbal; Stuart Pepper; Richard Byers; Wing John Chan; John Radford Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Stefan K Barta; Xiaonan Xue; Dan Wang; Jeannette Y Lee; Lawrence D Kaplan; Josep-Maria Ribera; Albert Oriol; Michele Spina; Umberto Tirelli; Francois Boue; Wyndham H Wilson; Christoph Wyen; Kieron Dunleavy; Ariela Noy; Joseph A Sparano Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Sandra Medina-Moreno; Juan C Zapata; Mackenzie L Cottrell; Nhut M Le; Sijia Tao; Joseph Bryant; Edward Sausville; Raymond F Schinazi; Angela Dm Kashuba; Robert R Redfield; Alonso Heredia Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2019
Authors: Yasuhiro Oki; Michael S Ewer; Daniel J Lenihan; Michael J Fisch; Fredrick B Hagemeister; Michelle Fanale; Jorge Romaguera; Barbara Pro; Nathan Fowler; Anas Younes; Alan B Astrow; Xuelin Huang; Larry W Kwak; Felipe Samaniego; Peter McLaughlin; Sattva S Neelapu; Michael Wang; Luis E Fayad; Jean-Bernard Durand; M Alma Rodriguez Journal: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Date: 2014-09-28
Authors: Satish Gopal; Monita R Patel; Elizabeth L Yanik; Stephen R Cole; Chad J Achenbach; Sonia Napravnik; Greer A Burkholder; Erin G Reid; Benigno Rodriguez; Steven G Deeks; Kenneth H Mayer; Richard D Moore; Mari M Kitahata; Kristy L Richards; Joseph J Eron Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Maudy C P Manyau; Tinashe Mudzviti; Simbarashe Rusakaniko; Elson T Mberi; Charles C Maponga; Gene D Morse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.240