Literature DB >> 18767891

NICE's 2008 Methods Guide: sensible consolidation or opportunities missed?

Mark Sculpher.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18767891     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.

Authors:  G Hawthorne; J Richardson; N A Day
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare's 'coverage with evidence development'.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues.

Authors:  John Hutton; Paul Trueman; Christopher Henshall
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  NICE Methodology for Technology Appraisals: cutting edge or tried and trusted?

Authors:  Louise Longworth; Carole Longson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Estimating 'costs' for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Alec Miners
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means.

Authors:  Christopher McCabe; Karl Claxton; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment.

Authors:  Alex Sutton; A E Ades; Nicola Cooper; Keith Abrams
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Exploring uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Karl Claxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Valuing health States for use in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John Brazier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Subgroups and heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  6 in total

1.  Economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness thresholds: signals to firms and implications for R & D investment and innovation.

Authors:  John A Vernon; Robert Goldberg; Joseph Golec
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The use of a Cumulative Needs for Care Monitor for individual treatment v. care as usual for patients diagnosed with severe mental illness, a cost-effectiveness analysis from the health care perspective.

Authors:  M Drukker; M Joore; J van Os; S Sytema; G Driessen; M Bak; Ph Delespaul
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  An economic evaluation of a video- and text-based computer-tailored intervention for smoking cessation: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicola E Stanczyk; Eline S Smit; Daniela N Schulz; Hein de Vries; Catherine Bolman; Jean W M Muris; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a Web-based or print-delivered tailored intervention to promote physical activity among adults aged over fifty: an economic evaluation of the Active Plus intervention.

Authors:  Rianne Hj Golsteijn; Denise A Peels; Silvia Maa Evers; Catherine Bolman; Aart N Mudde; Hein de Vries; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.

Authors:  Elena Nicod
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-08-18

6.  Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of Internet-based computer tailoring for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Eline Suzanne Smit; Silvia M A A Evers; Hein de Vries; Ciska Hoving
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.