Literature DB >> 18767623

Temporal changes in C and N stocks of restored prairie: implications for C sequestration strategies.

R Matamala1, J D Jastrow, R M Miller, C T Garten.   

Abstract

The recovery of ecosystem C and N dynamics after disturbance can be a slow process. Chronosequence approaches offer unique opportunities to use space-for-time substitution to quantify the recovery of ecosystem C and N stocks and estimate the potential of restoration practices for C sequestration. We studied the distribution of C and N stocks in two chronosequences that included long-term cultivated lands, 3- to 26-year-old prairie restorations, and remnant prairie on two related soil series. Results from the two chronosequences did not vary significantly and were combined. Based on modeling predictions, the recovery rates of different ecosystem components varied greatly. Overall, C stocks recovered faster than N stocks, but both C and N stocks recovered more rapidly for aboveground vegetation than for any other ecosystem component. Aboveground C and N reached 95% of remnant levels in only 13 years and 21 years, respectively, after planting to native vegetation. Belowground plant C and N recovered several decades later, while microbial biomass C, soil organic C (SOC), and total soil N recovered on a century timescale. In the cultivated fields, SOC concentrations were depleted within the surface 25 cm, coinciding with the depth of plowing, but cultivation apparently led to redistribution of soil C, increasing SOC stocks deeper in the soil profile. The restoration of prairie vegetation was effective at rebuilding soil organic matter (SOM) in the surface soil. Accrual rates were maintained at 43 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1) and 3 g N x m(-2) x yr(-1) in the surface 0.16 Mg/m2 soil mass during the first 26 years of restoration and were predicted to reach 50% of their storage potential (3500 g C/m2) in the first 100 years. We conclude that restoration of tallgrass prairie vegetation can restore SOM lost through cultivation and has the potential to sequester relatively large amounts of SOC over a sustained period of time. Whether restored prairies can retain the C apparently transferred to the subsoil by cultivation practices remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18767623     DOI: 10.1890/07-1609.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Plant and soil responses to high and low diversity grassland restoration practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bach; Sara G Baer; Johan Six
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production.

Authors:  Ilya Gelfand; Terenzio Zenone; Poonam Jasrotia; Jiquan Chen; Stephen K Hamilton; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils challenge climate sustainability in the US Corn Belt.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Lawrence; Carlos G Tenesaca; Andy VanLoocke; Steven J Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C4 to C3 grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Brian J Spiesman; Herika Kummel; Randall D Jackson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Comparing the effect of naturally restored forest and grassland on carbon sequestration and its vertical distribution in the Chinese Loess Plateau.

Authors:  Jie Wei; Jimin Cheng; Weijun Li; Weiguo Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differential Effects of Conservational Management on SOC Accumulation in the Grasslands of China.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Jie Tang; Wenjuan Sun; Yongqiang Yu; Wen Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diverse urban plantings managed with sufficient resource availability can increase plant productivity and arthropod diversity.

Authors:  Jonathon N Muller; Susan Loh; Ligia Braggion; Stephen Cameron; Jennifer L Firn
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Converting highly productive arable cropland in Europe to grassland: -a poor candidate for carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Paul Gosling; Christopher van der Gast; Gary D Bending
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils.

Authors:  Michaela Schratzberger; Martijn Holterman; Dick van Oevelen; Johannes Helder
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.589

10.  Cool Farm Tool Water: A global on-line tool to assess water use in crop production.

Authors:  Benjamin Kayatz; Gabriele Baroni; Jon Hillier; Stefan Lüdtke; Richard Heathcote; Daniella Malin; Carl van Tonder; Benjamin Kuster; Dirk Freese; Reinhard Hüttl; Martin Wattenbach
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.